
Core i3-N305

Core i5-9600T
Core i3-N305 vs Core i5-9600T Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i3-N305 vs Core i5-9600T FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i3-N305 vs Core i5-9600T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i3-N305
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +15.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 35W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1264 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (9,600 vs 9,601).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 9 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 31.1 vs 45.1 PassMark/$ ($309 MSRP vs $213 MSRP).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-9600T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i5-9600T
2019Why buy it
- ✅+0% higher PassMark.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (9 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Costs $96 less on MSRP ($213 MSRP vs $309 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 45.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 45.1 vs 31.1 PassMark/$ ($213 MSRP vs $309 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i3-N305 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌133.3% higher power demand at 35W vs 15W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while Core i3-N305 moves to FCBGA1264 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i3-N305 better than Core i5-9600T?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-N305 vs Core i5-9600T Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-N305
The Core i3-N305 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-N (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 0.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per module). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 9,600 points. Launch price was $309.

Core i5-9600T
The Core i5-9600T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2019 (6 years ago). It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 9 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 9,601 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core i3-N305 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i5-9600T offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the Core i3-N305 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i3-N305 versus 3.9 GHz on the Core i5-9600T — a 2.6% clock advantage for the Core i5-9600T (base: 0.1 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Core i3-N305 is built on the Alder Lake-N (2023) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i3-N305 scores 9,600 against the Core i5-9600T's 9,601 — a 0% lead for the Core i5-9600T. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i3-N305 vs 9 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Core i5-9600T.
| Feature | Core i3-N305 | Core i5-9600T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8+33% | 6 / 6 |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz | 3.9 GHz+3% |
| Base Clock | 0.1 GHz | 2.3 GHz+2200% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 9 MB Intel® Smart Cache+50% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per module) | — |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-N (2023) | — |
| PassMark | 9,600 | 9,601 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,344 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-N305 uses the FCBGA1264 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i5-9600T uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i3-N305 | Core i5-9600T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1264 | LGA1151 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | No |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i3-N305) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-9600T). The Core i5-9600T includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Core i3-N305 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-9600T targets Low Power Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-9600T rivals Ryzen 5 2400G.
| Feature | Core i3-N305 | Core i5-9600T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | — | Low Power Desktop |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i3-N305 was priced at $309, while the Core i5-9600T came in at $213. On launch pricing ($309 vs $213), Core i5-9600T was $96 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-N305 delivers 31.1 pts/$ vs 45.1 pts/$ for the Core i5-9600T — making the Core i5-9600T the 36.8% better value option.
| Feature | Core i3-N305 | Core i5-9600T |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $309 | $213-31% |
| Performance per Dollar | 31.1 | 45.1+45% |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2019 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














