
Core i3-N305 vs Xeon E5-2690

Core i3-N305

Xeon E5-2690
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i3-N305 is positioned at rank 681 and the Xeon E5-2690 is on rank 992, so the Core i3-N305 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i3-N305
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2690
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i3-N305 | Xeon E5-2690 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($309) | ✅ More affordable ($150) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Alder Lake-N (2023) / Intel 7 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i3-N305 | Xeon E5-2690 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+110%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($309) | ✅ More affordable ($150) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-N305 and Xeon E5-2690

Core i3-N305
The Core i3-N305 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-N (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 0.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per module). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 9,600 points. Launch price was $309.

Xeon E5-2690
The Xeon E5-2690 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 March 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 20480 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 9,764 points. Launch price was $397.
Processing Power
The Core i3-N305 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, matching the Xeon E5-2690's 8 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i3-N305 versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-2690 — identical boost frequencies (base: 0.1 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core i3-N305 uses the Alder Lake-N (2023) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon E5-2690 uses Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-N305 scores 9,600 against the Xeon E5-2690's 9,764 — a 1.7% lead for the Xeon E5-2690. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i3-N305 vs 20480 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-2690.
| Feature | Core i3-N305 | Xeon E5-2690 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 0.1 GHz | 2.9 GHz+2800% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 20480 kB (total)+233% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per module)+700% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-78% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-N (2023) | Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) |
| PassMark | 9,600 | 9,764+2% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-N305 uses the FCBGA1264 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E5-2690 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i3-N305 | Xeon E5-2690 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1264 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+150% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR3-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 384 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 4 |
| ECC Support | — | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 40 |
Value Analysis
The Core i3-N305 launched at $309 MSRP, while the Xeon E5-2690 debuted at $2057. At current prices ($309 vs $150), the Xeon E5-2690 is $159 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-N305 delivers 31.1 pts/$ vs 65.1 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2690 — making the Xeon E5-2690 the 70.8% better value option.
| Feature | Core i3-N305 | Xeon E5-2690 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $309-85% | $2057 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $309 | $150-51% |
| Performance per Dollar | 31.1 | 65.1+109% |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2012 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















