Core i3-N305 vs Xeon E5-2690

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-N305 vs Xeon E5-2690 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-N305 vs Xeon E5-2690: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-N305

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,748 less on MSRP ($309 MSRP vs $2,057 MSRP).
✅Delivers 554.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 31.1 vs 4.7 PassMark/$ ($309 MSRP vs $2,057 MSRP).
✅Draws 15W instead of 135W, a 120W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1264 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and older memory support.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2690 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (9,600 vs 9,764).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 20 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2690, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.

Xeon E5-2690

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +10.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+233.3% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 6 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 0.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 4.7 vs 31.1 PassMark/$ ($2,057 MSRP vs $309 MSRP).
❌800% higher power demand at 135W vs 15W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2011, while Core i3-N305 moves to FCBGA1264 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2690 better than Core i3-N305?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2690 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i3-N305 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-2690 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 10.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2690 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.7% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 233.3% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-2690 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Xeon E5-2690 comes in 565.7% more expensive on MSRP at $2,057 MSRP versus $309 MSRP, and it still gives you a 10.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i3-N305 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 10.9% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-N305 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2012) and a healthier platform with FCBGA1264 and DDR5 instead of LGA2011. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i3-N305 vs Xeon E5-2690 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-N305

The Core i3-N305 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-N (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 0.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per module). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 9,600 points. Launch price was $309.

Xeon E5-2690

The Xeon E5-2690 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 March 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 20480 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 9,764 points. Launch price was $397.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-N305 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, matching the Xeon E5-2690's 8 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i3-N305 versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-2690 — identical boost frequencies (base: 0.1 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core i3-N305 uses the Alder Lake-N (2023) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon E5-2690 uses Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-N305 scores 9,600 against the Xeon E5-2690's 9,764 — a 1.7% lead for the Xeon E5-2690. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i3-N305 vs 20480 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-2690.

Feature	Core i3-N305	Xeon E5-2690
Cores / Threads	8 / 8	8 / 16
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz	3.8 GHz
Base Clock	0.1 GHz	2.9 GHz+2800%
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	20480 kB (total)+233%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per module)+700%	256 kB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm-78%	32 nm
Architecture	Alder Lake-N (2023)	Sandy Bridge-EP (2012)
PassMark	9,600	9,764+2%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-N305 uses the FCBGA1264 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E5-2690 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-N305	Xeon E5-2690
Socket	FCBGA1264	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+150%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity	—	384 GB
RAM Channels	—	4
ECC Support	—	Yes
PCIe Lanes	—	40

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i3-N305 was priced at $309, while the Xeon E5-2690 came in at $2057. On launch pricing ($309 vs $2057), Core i3-N305 was $1748 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-N305 delivers 31.1 pts/$ vs 4.7 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2690 — making the Core i3-N305 the 147% better value option.

Feature	Core i3-N305	Xeon E5-2690
MSRP	$309-85%	$2057
Performance per Dollar	31.1+562%	4.7
Release Date	2023	2012

Search Core i3-N305 on Amazon

Search Xeon E5-2690 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.