
Core i3-N305

Core i7-7740X
Core i3-N305 vs Core i7-7740X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i3-N305 vs Core i7-7740X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i3-N305 vs Core i7-7740X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i3-N305
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $30 less on MSRP ($309 MSRP vs $339 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 8.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 31.1 vs 28.5 PassMark/$ ($309 MSRP vs $339 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 112W, a 97W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1264 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2066 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-7740X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (9,600 vs 9,678).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
Core i7-7740X
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +14.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 28.5 vs 31.1 PassMark/$ ($339 MSRP vs $309 MSRP).
- ❌646.7% higher power demand at 112W vs 15W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2066 with DDR4, while Core i3-N305 moves to FCBGA1264 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-7740X better than Core i3-N305?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-N305 vs Core i7-7740X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-N305
The Core i3-N305 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-N (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 0.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per module). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 9,600 points. Launch price was $309.

Core i7-7740X
The Core i7-7740X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 26 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake-X (2017) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 112 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 9,678 points. Launch price was $339.
Processing Power
The Core i3-N305 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i7-7740X offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i3-N305 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i3-N305 versus 4.5 GHz on the Core i7-7740X — a 16.9% clock advantage for the Core i7-7740X (base: 0.1 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The Core i3-N305 uses the Alder Lake-N (2023) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i7-7740X uses Kaby Lake-X (2017) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-N305 scores 9,600 against the Core i7-7740X's 9,678 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i7-7740X. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i3-N305 vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-7740X.
| Feature | Core i3-N305 | Core i7-7740X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8+100% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz | 4.5 GHz+18% |
| Base Clock | 0.1 GHz | 4.3 GHz+4200% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 8 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per module) | 256K (per core)+12700% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-N (2023) | Kaby Lake-X (2017) |
| PassMark | 9,600 | 9,678 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-N305 uses the FCBGA1264 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i7-7740X uses LGA2066 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i3-N305 | Core i7-7740X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1264 | LGA2066 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | No |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i3-N305) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-7740X). Primary use case: Core i7-7740X targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i3-N305 | Core i7-7740X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i3-N305 was priced at $309, while the Core i7-7740X came in at $339. On launch pricing ($309 vs $339), Core i3-N305 was $30 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-N305 delivers 31.1 pts/$ vs 28.5 pts/$ for the Core i7-7740X — making the Core i3-N305 the 8.5% better value option.
| Feature | Core i3-N305 | Core i7-7740X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $309-9% | $339 |
| Performance per Dollar | 31.1+9% | 28.5 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2017 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














