Core i3-N305
VS
Core i5-10400T

Core i3-N305 vs Core i5-10400T

Intel

Core i3-N305

8 Cores8 Thrd15 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2023
VS
Intel

Core i5-10400T

6 Cores12 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2020

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Core i3-N305 is positioned at rank #681 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-N305

#669
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
944%
#670
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
930%
#671
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
854%
#672
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
850%
#673
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
843%
#675
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
814%
#676
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
780%
#677
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
779%
#678
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
758%
#681
Core i3-N305
MSRP: $309|Avg: $309
100%
#695
Processor N95
MSRP: $160|Avg: $80
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-10400T

#175
Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
MSRP: $149|Avg: $105.5
106%
#176
Core i7-13700
MSRP: $384|Avg: $350
106%
#177
Athlon 200GE
MSRP: $55|Avg: $40
105%
#178
Core i5-13500E
MSRP: $235|Avg: $235
105%
#179
Core i5-12500E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $200
104%
#180
Core i9-11900
MSRP: $439|Avg: $220
104%
#181
Core i7-12700E
MSRP: $314|Avg: $278
104%
#182
Core i3-14100T
MSRP: $134|Avg: $135
104%
#183
Core i5-13400T
MSRP: $221|Avg: $200
104%
#184
Core i3-12300
MSRP: $143|Avg: $143
103%
#185
Core i5-10505
MSRP: $192|Avg: $120
102%
#186
Ryzen 3 4300G
MSRP: $149|Avg: $100
102%
#187
Ryzen 9 3950X
MSRP: $749|Avg: $389
101%
#188
Ryzen 5 PRO 4655G
MSRP: $165|Avg: $165
101%
#189
Ryzen 7 4700GE
MSRP: $299|Avg: $200
100%
#190
Core i5-10400T
MSRP: $182|Avg: $100
100%
#191
Core i5-10600KF
MSRP: $250|Avg: $145
100%
#192
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE
MSRP: $99|Avg: $70
99%
#193
Core i9-12900F
MSRP: $494|Avg: $370
99%
#194
Core i5-12400
MSRP: $209|Avg: $195
98%
#195
Ryzen 5 7400
MSRP: $229|Avg: $229
98%
#196
Ryzen 9 9900X3D
MSRP: $599|Avg: $589
98%
#197
Ryzen 5 5600X3D
MSRP: $229|Avg: $229
98%
#198
Core i3-9350KF
MSRP: $173|Avg: $80
97%
#199
Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE
MSRP: $220|Avg: $220
97%
#200
Core i3-9300
MSRP: $143|Avg: $75
97%
#201
Ryzen 7 3800XT
MSRP: $399|Avg: $249
96%
#202
Core i5-11400T
MSRP: $182|Avg: $140
95%
#203
Core i3-10305
MSRP: $149|Avg: $100
94%
#204
Core i3-9320
MSRP: $154|Avg: $80
94%
#205
Core i3-10105
MSRP: $122|Avg: $90
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core i3-N305 leads in gaming performance. However, the Core i5-10400T is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 1.9% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore i3-N305Core i5-10400T
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($309)
More affordable ($100)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Alder Lake-N (2023) / Intel 7 nm)
✨ Modern (Legacy / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: The Core i5-10400T leads not only in performance but also in value. It is effectively 68% cheaper ($100 vs $309) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightCore i3-N305Core i5-10400T
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+215%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($309)
More affordable ($100)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-N305 and Core i5-10400T

Intel

Core i3-N305

The Core i3-N305 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-N (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 0.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per module). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 9,600 points. Launch price was $309.

Intel

Core i5-10400T

The Core i5-10400T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2020 (5 years ago). It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 9,789 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Core i3-N305 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i5-10400T offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i3-N305 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i3-N305 versus 3.6 GHz on the Core i5-10400T — a 5.4% clock advantage for the Core i3-N305 (base: 0.1 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i3-N305 is built on the Alder Lake-N (2023) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i3-N305 scores 9,600 against the Core i5-10400T's 9,789 — a 1.9% lead for the Core i5-10400T. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i3-N305 vs 12 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Core i5-10400T.

FeatureCore i3-N305Core i5-10400T
Cores / Threads
8 / 8+33%
6 / 12
Boost Clock
3.8 GHz+6%
3.6 GHz
Base Clock
0.1 GHz
2 GHz+1900%
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)
12 MB Intel® Smart Cache+100%
L2 Cache
2 MB (per module)
Process
Intel 7 nm-50%
14 nm
Architecture
Alder Lake-N (2023)
PassMark
9,600
9,789+2%
Geekbench 6 Single
1,272
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-N305 uses the FCBGA1264 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i5-10400T uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i3-N305Core i5-10400T
Socket
FCBGA1264
LGA1200
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+67%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core i3-N305) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-10400T). The Core i5-10400T includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Core i3-N305 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-10400T targets Low Power Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400T rivals Ryzen 5 3400GE.

FeatureCore i3-N305Core i5-10400T
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 630
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Low Power Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i3-N305 launched at $309 MSRP, while the Core i5-10400T debuted at $182. At current prices ($309 vs $100), the Core i5-10400T is $209 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-N305 delivers 31.1 pts/$ vs 97.9 pts/$ for the Core i5-10400T — making the Core i5-10400T the 103.6% better value option.

FeatureCore i3-N305Core i5-10400T
MSRP
$309
$182-41%
Avg Price (30d)
$309
$100-68%
Performance per Dollar
31.1
97.9+215%
Release Date
2023
2020