
Core i5-9600T

Xeon E3-1285 v6
Core i5-9600T vs Xeon E3-1285 v6 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-9600T vs Xeon E3-1285 v6 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-9600T vs Xeon E3-1285 v6: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-9600T
2019Why buy it
- ✅+1% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $237 less on MSRP ($213 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 113.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 45.1 vs 21.1 PassMark/$ ($213 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 79W, a 44W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E3-1285 v6 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E3-1285 v6, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads.
Xeon E3-1285 v6
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +39.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (9,502 vs 9,601).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 21.1 vs 45.1 PassMark/$ ($450 MSRP vs $213 MSRP).
- ❌125.7% higher power demand at 79W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-9600T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-9600T better than Xeon E3-1285 v6?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-9600T vs Xeon E3-1285 v6 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-9600T
The Core i5-9600T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2019 (6 years ago). It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 9 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 9,601 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E3-1285 v6
The Xeon E3-1285 v6 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake-DT (2017) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 4.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 79 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400, DDR3L-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 9,502 points. Launch price was $450.
Processing Power
The Core i5-9600T packs 6 cores / 6 threads, while the Xeon E3-1285 v6 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i5-9600T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i5-9600T versus 4.5 GHz on the Xeon E3-1285 v6 — a 14.3% clock advantage for the Xeon E3-1285 v6 (base: 2.3 GHz vs 4.1 GHz). The Xeon E3-1285 v6 is built on the Kaby Lake-DT (2017) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i5-9600T scores 9,601 against the Xeon E3-1285 v6's 9,502 — a 1% lead for the Core i5-9600T. L3 cache: 9 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Core i5-9600T vs 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E3-1285 v6.
| Feature | Core i5-9600T | Xeon E3-1285 v6 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 6+50% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz | 4.5 GHz+15% |
| Base Clock | 2.3 GHz | 4.1 GHz+78% |
| L3 Cache | 9 MB Intel® Smart Cache+13% | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | — | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | — | Kaby Lake-DT (2017) |
| PassMark | 9,601+1% | 9,502 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,344 | — |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA1151 socket with PCIe 3.0.
| Feature | Core i5-9600T | Xeon E3-1285 v6 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | LGA1151 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-9600T) / not specified (Xeon E3-1285 v6). The Core i5-9600T includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Xeon E3-1285 v6 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-9600T targets Low Power Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-9600T rivals Ryzen 5 2400G.
| Feature | Core i5-9600T | Xeon E3-1285 v6 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Low Power Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-9600T was priced at $213, while the Xeon E3-1285 v6 came in at $450. On launch pricing ($213 vs $450), Core i5-9600T was $237 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-9600T delivers 45.1 pts/$ vs 21.1 pts/$ for the Xeon E3-1285 v6 — making the Core i5-9600T the 72.4% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-9600T | Xeon E3-1285 v6 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $213-53% | $450 |
| Performance per Dollar | 45.1+114% | 21.1 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2017 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














