
Core i7-10510Y vs Celeron G6900T

Core i7-10510Y

Celeron G6900T
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Core i7-10510Y is positioned at rank #1069 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i7-10510Y
Performance Per Dollar Celeron G6900T
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i7-10510Y | Celeron G6900T |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($50) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Comet Lake-Y (2019) / 14 nm) | ✨ Modern (Alder Lake-S (2022) / Intel 7 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i7-10510Y | Celeron G6900T |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($50) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-10510Y and Celeron G6900T

Core i7-10510Y
The Core i7-10510Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-Y (2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: UTFCBGA1377. Thermal design power (TDP): 7 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,631 points. Launch price was $69.

Celeron G6900T
The Celeron G6900T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 3,668 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Core i7-10510Y packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Celeron G6900T offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Core i7-10510Y has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core i7-10510Y versus 2.8 GHz on the Celeron G6900T — a 46.6% clock advantage for the Core i7-10510Y (base: 1.2 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core i7-10510Y uses the Comet Lake-Y (2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Celeron G6900T uses Alder Lake-S (2022) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-10510Y scores 3,631 against the Celeron G6900T's 3,668 — a 1% lead for the Celeron G6900T. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,270 vs 1,400, a 9.7% lead for the Celeron G6900T that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 2,960 vs 2,450 (18.9% advantage for the Core i7-10510Y). L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-10510Y vs 4 MB (total) on the Celeron G6900T.
| Feature | Core i7-10510Y | Celeron G6900T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8+100% | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz+61% | 2.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.2 GHz | 2.8 GHz+133% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total)+100% | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core)+400% |
| Process | 14 nm | Intel 7 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Comet Lake-Y (2019) | Alder Lake-S (2022) |
| PassMark | 3,631 | 3,668+1% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,270 | 1,400+10% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 2,960+21% | 2,450 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-10510Y uses the UTFCBGA1377 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron G6900T uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR3-2133 on the Core i7-10510Y versus DDR5-4800 on the Celeron G6900T — the Celeron G6900T supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G6900T supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 10 (Core i7-10510Y) vs 20 (Celeron G6900T) — the Celeron G6900T offers 10 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Comet Lake-Y (Core i7-10510Y) and H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760 (Celeron G6900T).
| Feature | Core i7-10510Y | Celeron G6900T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | UTFCBGA1377 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR3-2133 | DDR5-4800+67% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 128 GB+700% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 10 | 20+100% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-10510Y) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Celeron G6900T). Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics 617 (Core i7-10510Y) and Intel UHD Graphics 710 (Celeron G6900T) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-10510Y targets Ultrabook/Tablet, Celeron G6900T targets Low Power Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron G6900T rivals Pentium Gold G7400T.
| Feature | Core i7-10510Y | Celeron G6900T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 617 | Intel UHD Graphics 710 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Ultrabook/Tablet | Low Power Desktop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















