Core i7-10810U
VS
Core i7-6700

Core i7-10810U vs Core i7-6700

Intel

Core i7-10810U

6 Cores12 Thrd25 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2020
VS
Intel

Core i7-6700

4 Cores8 Thrd65 WWMax: 4 GHz2015

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-10810U is positioned at rank 16 and the Core i7-6700 is on rank 650, so the Core i7-10810U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-10810U

#4
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
129%
#5
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
127%
#6
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
116%
#7
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
116%
#8
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
115%
#10
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
111%
#11
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
106%
#12
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
106%
#13
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
103%
#16
Core i7-10810U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#17
Core i3-350M
MSRP: $130|Avg: $10
95%
#18
Atom x5-E8000
MSRP: $18|Avg: N/A
94%
#19
Core 2 Duo T5900
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $5
93%
#22
Core i3-3130M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
84%
#23
Core 2 Duo T5550
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $5
80%
#24
Core 2 Duo T7100
MSRP: $197|Avg: $15
80%
#27
Pentium 2030M
MSRP: $134|Avg: N/A
76%
#28
Core 2 Duo T5750
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $8
76%
#29
Core 2 Duo T7200
MSRP: $286|Avg: $6
75%
#30
Core i5-3230M
MSRP: $225|Avg: $13
75%
#31
Atom D525
MSRP: $63|Avg: N/A
75%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-6700

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
11736%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
11090%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
8052%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2426%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1921%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1681%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
963%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
950%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
865%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
865%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
855%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
832%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
821%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
817%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
810%
#388
Ryzen Embedded R2312
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
99%
#389
Ryzen Threadripper 7980X
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $5200
98%
#650
Core i7-6700
MSRP: $303|Avg: $143
100%
#651
Athlon II X4 631
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
100%
#652
Pentium G3240T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $15
100%
#653
Core i3-4160T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $18
99%
#657
Core i3-4350
MSRP: $138|Avg: $130
99%
#659
Core i5-6600T
MSRP: $213|Avg: $35
98%
#660
FX-4350
MSRP: $122|Avg: $140
98%
#661
Core i5-3570T
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
98%
#662
Core i5-6600K
MSRP: $242|Avg: $105
98%
#663
Core i5-4440
MSRP: $184|Avg: $101
98%
#664
Core i3-4370
MSRP: $149|Avg: $41
97%
#665
Core i5-7500T
MSRP: $202|Avg: $130
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i7-10810U (2020) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR3, DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore i7-10810UCore i7-6700
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($143)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Comet Lake-U (2019−2020) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Skylake (2015−2016) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i7-6700 (2015) relies on 14 nm technology and DDR3, DDR4, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore i7-10810UCore i7-6700
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($143)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-10810U and Core i7-6700

Intel

Core i7-10810U

The Core i7-10810U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-U (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1528. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,987 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Core i7-6700

The Core i7-6700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 July 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 8,048 points. Launch price was $303.

Processing Power

The Core i7-10810U packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Core i7-6700 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i7-10810U has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-10810U versus 4 GHz on the Core i7-6700 — a 20.2% clock advantage for the Core i7-10810U (base: 1.1 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core i7-10810U uses the Comet Lake-U (2019−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-6700 uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-10810U scores 7,987 against the Core i7-6700's 8,048 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i7-6700. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-10810U vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-6700.

FeatureCore i7-10810UCore i7-6700
Cores / Threads
6 / 12+50%
4 / 8
Boost Clock
4.9 GHz+23%
4 GHz
Base Clock
1.1 GHz
3.4 GHz+209%
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)+50%
8 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Comet Lake-U (2019−2020)
Skylake (2015−2016)
PassMark
7,987
8,048
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-10810U uses the FCBGA1528 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-6700 uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-10810UCore i7-6700
Socket
FCBGA1528
LGA1151
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0