Core i7-10810U vs Ryzen 5 2600H

Core i7-10810U vs Ryzen 5 2600H Performance Spectrum

Core i7-10810U

6 / 12

7,987

0.0%

8,002

+0.2%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-10810U vs Ryzen 5 2600H FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-10810U vs Ryzen 5 2600H: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-10810U

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +27.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+200% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Draws 25W instead of 45W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (7,987 vs 8,002).

Ryzen 5 2600H

2018

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-10810U across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 12 MB).
❌80% higher power demand at 45W vs 25W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-10810U better than Ryzen 5 2600H?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i7-10810U is ahead with a 27.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 2600H pulls ahead with 0.2% better PassMark. Core i7-10810U also has the bigger cache pool with 200% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 2600H is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-10810U still makes the most sense overall. Core i7-10810U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 27.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-10810U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2018) and 200% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 4 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-10810U vs Ryzen 5 2600H Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-10810U

The Core i7-10810U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-U (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1528. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,987 points. Launch price was $149.

Ryzen 5 2600H

The Ryzen 5 2600H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 September 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Raven Ridge (2017−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 8,002 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-10810U packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 5 2600H offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i7-10810U has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-10810U versus 3.6 GHz on the Ryzen 5 2600H — a 30.6% clock advantage for the Core i7-10810U (base: 1.1 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i7-10810U uses the Comet Lake-U (2019−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 2600H uses Raven Ridge (2017−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-10810U scores 7,987 against the Ryzen 5 2600H's 8,002 — a 0.2% lead for the Ryzen 5 2600H. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-10810U vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 2600H.

Feature	Core i7-10810U	Ryzen 5 2600H
Cores / Threads	6 / 12+50%	4 / 8
Boost Clock	4.9 GHz+36%	3.6 GHz
Base Clock	1.1 GHz	3.2 GHz+191%
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)+200%	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512 kB (per core)+100%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Comet Lake-U (2019−2020)	Raven Ridge (2017−2019)
PassMark	7,987	8,002

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-10810U uses the FCBGA1528 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 2600H uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.