Core i7-8709G
VS
Core i7-10810U

Core i7-8709G vs Core i7-10810U

Intel

Core i7-8709G

4 Cores8 Thrd100 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2018
VS
Intel

Core i7-10810U

6 Cores12 Thrd25 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2020

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-8709G is positioned at rank 818 and the Core i7-10810U is on rank 16, so the Core i7-10810U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-8709G

#806
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1250%
#807
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1232%
#808
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1131%
#809
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1126%
#810
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1115%
#812
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1077%
#813
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1033%
#814
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1031%
#815
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1003%
#818
Core i7-8709G
MSRP: $338|Avg: $150
100%
#819
Celeron M 560
MSRP: $86|Avg: $10
99%
#824
Celeron Dual-Core T3000
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
96%
#825
Pentium P6100
MSRP: $100|Avg: $16.39
96%
#828
Celeron M 575
MSRP: $86|Avg: $12
95%
#829
Core i7-10710U
MSRP: $415|Avg: N/A
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-10810U

#4
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
129%
#5
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
127%
#6
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
116%
#7
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
116%
#8
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
115%
#10
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
111%
#11
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
106%
#12
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
106%
#13
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
103%
#16
Core i7-10810U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#17
Core i3-350M
MSRP: $130|Avg: $10
95%
#18
Atom x5-E8000
MSRP: $18|Avg: N/A
94%
#19
Core 2 Duo T5900
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $5
93%
#22
Core i3-3130M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
84%
#23
Core 2 Duo T5550
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $5
80%
#24
Core 2 Duo T7100
MSRP: $197|Avg: $15
80%
#27
Pentium 2030M
MSRP: $134|Avg: N/A
76%
#28
Core 2 Duo T5750
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $8
76%
#29
Core 2 Duo T7200
MSRP: $286|Avg: $6
75%
#30
Core i5-3230M
MSRP: $225|Avg: $13
75%
#31
Atom D525
MSRP: $63|Avg: N/A
75%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core i7-10810U delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core i7-8709G in both compute-intensive tasks (0.7% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore i7-8709GCore i7-10810U
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($150)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Kaby Lake G (2018) / 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Comet Lake-U (2019−2020) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i7-8709GCore i7-10810U
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($150)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-8709G and Core i7-10810U

Intel

Core i7-8709G

The Core i7-8709G is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 February 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake G (2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2270. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 7,934 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Core i7-10810U

The Core i7-10810U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-U (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1528. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,987 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Core i7-8709G packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i7-10810U offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i7-10810U has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the Core i7-8709G versus 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-10810U — a 17.8% clock advantage for the Core i7-10810U (base: 3.1 GHz vs 1.1 GHz). The Core i7-8709G uses the Kaby Lake G (2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-10810U uses Comet Lake-U (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-8709G scores 7,934 against the Core i7-10810U's 7,987 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i7-10810U. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-8709G vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-10810U.

FeatureCore i7-8709GCore i7-10810U
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
6 / 12+50%
Boost Clock
4.1 GHz
4.9 GHz+20%
Base Clock
3.1 GHz+182%
1.1 GHz
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
12 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Kaby Lake G (2018)
Comet Lake-U (2019−2020)
PassMark
7,934
7,987
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-8709G uses the FCBGA2270 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-10810U uses FCBGA1528 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-8709GCore i7-10810U
Socket
FCBGA2270
FCBGA1528
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0