Core i7-6700 vs Core i7-8709G

Intel

Core i7-6700

4 Cores8 Thrd65 WWMax: 4 GHz2015

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Core i7-8709G

4 Cores8 Thrd100 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2018

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i7-6700

2015

Why buy it

  • +1.4% higher PassMark.
  • Costs $35 less on MSRP ($303 MSRP vs $338 MSRP).
  • Delivers 13.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 26.6 vs 23.5 PassMark/$ ($303 MSRP vs $338 MSRP).
  • Draws 65W instead of 100W, a 35W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Core i7-8709G

2018

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Lower PassMark (7,934 vs 8,048).
    • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 23.5 vs 26.6 PassMark/$ ($338 MSRP vs $303 MSRP).
    • 53.8% higher power demand at 100W vs 65W.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Core i7-6700 better than Core i7-8709G?
    It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Core i7-8709G is ahead with a 2.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-6700 pulls ahead with 1.4% better PassMark.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-6700 is the better fit. You are getting 1.4% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Core i7-6700 is the smarter buy today. Core i7-6700 is $35 cheaper on MSRP at $303 MSRP versus $338 MSRP, and it gives you 1.4% better PassMark. The trade-off is that Core i7-8709G is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 2.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 13.2% better value on MSRP (26.6 vs 23.5 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Core i7-8709G is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2015). That makes it the safer long-term pick.

    Games Benchmarks

    Paired with RTX 4090

    To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

    Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

    Path of Exile 2

    Path of Exile 2

    PresetCore i7-6700Core i7-8709G
    1080p
    low171 FPS188 FPS
    medium136 FPS149 FPS
    high109 FPS119 FPS
    ultra84 FPS93 FPS
    1440p
    low147 FPS151 FPS
    medium116 FPS118 FPS
    high92 FPS93 FPS
    ultra71 FPS73 FPS
    4K
    low67 FPS71 FPS
    medium57 FPS59 FPS
    high44 FPS47 FPS
    ultra35 FPS37 FPS
    Counter-Strike 2

    Counter-Strike 2

    PresetCore i7-6700Core i7-8709G
    1080p
    low201 FPS198 FPS
    medium176 FPS198 FPS
    high160 FPS198 FPS
    ultra124 FPS191 FPS
    1440p
    low178 FPS198 FPS
    medium153 FPS198 FPS
    high138 FPS198 FPS
    ultra111 FPS169 FPS
    4K
    low140 FPS198 FPS
    medium124 FPS176 FPS
    high101 FPS146 FPS
    ultra75 FPS121 FPS
    League of Legends

    League of Legends

    PresetCore i7-6700Core i7-8709G
    1080p
    low201 FPS198 FPS
    medium201 FPS198 FPS
    high201 FPS198 FPS
    ultra201 FPS198 FPS
    1440p
    low201 FPS198 FPS
    medium201 FPS198 FPS
    high201 FPS198 FPS
    ultra201 FPS198 FPS
    4K
    low201 FPS198 FPS
    medium201 FPS198 FPS
    high201 FPS198 FPS
    ultra201 FPS198 FPS
    Valorant

    Valorant

    PresetCore i7-6700Core i7-8709G
    1080p
    low201 FPS198 FPS
    medium201 FPS198 FPS
    high201 FPS198 FPS
    ultra201 FPS198 FPS
    1440p
    low201 FPS198 FPS
    medium201 FPS198 FPS
    high201 FPS198 FPS
    ultra201 FPS198 FPS
    4K
    low201 FPS198 FPS
    medium201 FPS198 FPS
    high201 FPS198 FPS
    ultra201 FPS198 FPS

    Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-6700 and Core i7-8709G

    Intel

    Core i7-6700

    The Core i7-6700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 July 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 8,048 points. Launch price was $303.

    Intel

    Core i7-8709G

    The Core i7-8709G is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 February 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake G (2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2270. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 7,934 points. Launch price was $149.

    Processing Power

    Both the Core i7-6700 and Core i7-8709G share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Core i7-6700 versus 4.1 GHz on the Core i7-8709G — a 2.5% clock advantage for the Core i7-8709G (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Core i7-6700 uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-8709G uses Kaby Lake G (2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-6700 scores 8,048 against the Core i7-8709G's 7,934 — a 1.4% lead for the Core i7-6700. Both processors carry 8 MB (total) of L3 cache.

    FeatureCore i7-6700Core i7-8709G
    Cores / Threads
    4 / 8
    4 / 8
    Boost Clock
    4 GHz
    4.1 GHz+2%
    Base Clock
    3.4 GHz+10%
    3.1 GHz
    L3 Cache
    8 MB (total)
    8 MB (total)
    L2 Cache
    256 kB (per core)
    256K (per core)
    Process
    14 nm
    14 nm
    Architecture
    Skylake (2015−2016)
    Kaby Lake G (2018)
    PassMark
    8,048+1%
    7,934
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Core i7-6700 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-8709G uses FCBGA2270 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureCore i7-6700Core i7-8709G
    Socket
    LGA1151
    FCBGA2270
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 3.0
    PCIe 3.0
    💰

    Value Analysis

    The Core i7-6700 launched at $303 MSRP, while the Core i7-8709G debuted at $338. On MSRP ($303 vs $338), the Core i7-6700 is $35 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-6700 delivers 26.6 pts/$ vs 23.5 pts/$ for the Core i7-8709G — making the Core i7-6700 the 12.3% better value option.

    FeatureCore i7-6700Core i7-8709G
    MSRP
    $303-10%
    $338
    Performance per Dollar
    26.6+13%
    23.5
    Release Date
    2015
    2018