
Core i7-6700
Popular choices:

Core i7-8709G
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-6700
2015Why buy it
- ✅+1.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $35 less on MSRP ($303 MSRP vs $338 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 13.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 26.6 vs 23.5 PassMark/$ ($303 MSRP vs $338 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 100W, a 35W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Core i7-8709G
2018Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (7,934 vs 8,048).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 23.5 vs 26.6 PassMark/$ ($338 MSRP vs $303 MSRP).
- ❌53.8% higher power demand at 100W vs 65W.
Core i7-6700
2015Core i7-8709G
2018Why buy it
- ✅+1.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $35 less on MSRP ($303 MSRP vs $338 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 13.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 26.6 vs 23.5 PassMark/$ ($303 MSRP vs $338 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 100W, a 35W reduction.
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (7,934 vs 8,048).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 23.5 vs 26.6 PassMark/$ ($338 MSRP vs $303 MSRP).
- ❌53.8% higher power demand at 100W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-6700 better than Core i7-8709G?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-6700 | Core i7-8709G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 171 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 109 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 147 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-6700 | Core i7-8709G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 201 FPS | 198 FPS |
| medium | 176 FPS | 198 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 198 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 191 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 178 FPS | 198 FPS |
| medium | 153 FPS | 198 FPS |
| high | 138 FPS | 198 FPS |
| ultra | 111 FPS | 169 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 140 FPS | 198 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 176 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 121 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-6700 | Core i7-8709G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 201 FPS | 198 FPS |
| medium | 201 FPS | 198 FPS |
| high | 201 FPS | 198 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 198 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 201 FPS | 198 FPS |
| medium | 201 FPS | 198 FPS |
| high | 201 FPS | 198 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 198 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 201 FPS | 198 FPS |
| medium | 201 FPS | 198 FPS |
| high | 201 FPS | 198 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 198 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-6700 | Core i7-8709G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 201 FPS | 198 FPS |
| medium | 201 FPS | 198 FPS |
| high | 201 FPS | 198 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 198 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 201 FPS | 198 FPS |
| medium | 201 FPS | 198 FPS |
| high | 201 FPS | 198 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 198 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 201 FPS | 198 FPS |
| medium | 201 FPS | 198 FPS |
| high | 201 FPS | 198 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 198 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-6700 and Core i7-8709G

Core i7-6700
Core i7-6700
The Core i7-6700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 July 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 8,048 points. Launch price was $303.

Core i7-8709G
Core i7-8709G
The Core i7-8709G is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 February 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake G (2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2270. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 7,934 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
Both the Core i7-6700 and Core i7-8709G share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Core i7-6700 versus 4.1 GHz on the Core i7-8709G — a 2.5% clock advantage for the Core i7-8709G (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Core i7-6700 uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-8709G uses Kaby Lake G (2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-6700 scores 8,048 against the Core i7-8709G's 7,934 — a 1.4% lead for the Core i7-6700. Both processors carry 8 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core i7-6700 | Core i7-8709G |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz | 4.1 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+10% | 3.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Skylake (2015−2016) | Kaby Lake G (2018) |
| PassMark | 8,048+1% | 7,934 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-6700 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-8709G uses FCBGA2270 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-6700 | Core i7-8709G |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | FCBGA2270 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-6700 launched at $303 MSRP, while the Core i7-8709G debuted at $338. On MSRP ($303 vs $338), the Core i7-6700 is $35 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-6700 delivers 26.6 pts/$ vs 23.5 pts/$ for the Core i7-8709G — making the Core i7-6700 the 12.3% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-6700 | Core i7-8709G |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $303-10% | $338 |
| Performance per Dollar | 26.6+13% | 23.5 |
| Release Date | 2015 | 2018 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












