Core i5-10200H
VS
Core i7-6700

Core i5-10200H vs Core i7-6700

Intel

Core i5-10200H

4 Cores8 Thrd45 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2020
VS
Intel

Core i7-6700

4 Cores8 Thrd65 WWMax: 4 GHz2015

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-10200H is positioned at rank 26 and the Core i7-6700 is on rank 650, so the Core i5-10200H offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-10200H

#14
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
165%
#15
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
163%
#16
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
149%
#17
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
149%
#18
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
147%
#20
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
142%
#21
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
136%
#22
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
136%
#23
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
133%
#26
Core i5-10200H
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#27
Pentium 2030M
MSRP: $134|Avg: N/A
98%
#28
Core 2 Duo T5750
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $8
98%
#29
Core 2 Duo T7200
MSRP: $286|Avg: $6
97%
#30
Core i5-3230M
MSRP: $225|Avg: $13
96%
#31
Atom D525
MSRP: $63|Avg: N/A
96%
#32
Atom x7835RE
MSRP: $127|Avg: N/A
96%
#33
Core 2 Duo P8400
MSRP: $209|Avg: $10
94%
#38
Core 2 Duo T8100
MSRP: $209|Avg: $10
87%
#39
Atom 330
MSRP: $43|Avg: $30
86%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-6700

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
11736%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
11090%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
8052%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2426%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1921%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1681%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
963%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
950%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
865%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
865%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
855%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
832%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
821%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
817%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
810%
#388
Ryzen Embedded R2312
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
99%
#389
Ryzen Threadripper 7980X
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $5200
98%
#650
Core i7-6700
MSRP: $303|Avg: $143
100%
#651
Athlon II X4 631
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
100%
#652
Pentium G3240T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $15
100%
#653
Core i3-4160T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $18
99%
#657
Core i3-4350
MSRP: $138|Avg: $130
99%
#659
Core i5-6600T
MSRP: $213|Avg: $35
98%
#660
FX-4350
MSRP: $122|Avg: $140
98%
#661
Core i5-3570T
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
98%
#662
Core i5-6600K
MSRP: $242|Avg: $105
98%
#663
Core i5-4440
MSRP: $184|Avg: $101
98%
#664
Core i3-4370
MSRP: $149|Avg: $41
97%
#665
Core i5-7500T
MSRP: $202|Avg: $130
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i5-10200H (2020) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore i5-10200HCore i7-6700
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($143)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Comet Lake-H (2020) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Skylake (2015−2016) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i7-6700 (2015) relies on 14 nm technology and DDR3, DDR4, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore i5-10200HCore i7-6700
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($143)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10200H and Core i7-6700

Intel

Core i5-10200H

The Core i5-10200H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 17 September 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-H (2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,997 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Core i7-6700

The Core i7-6700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 July 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 8,048 points. Launch price was $303.

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-10200H and Core i7-6700 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the Core i5-10200H versus 4 GHz on the Core i7-6700 — a 2.5% clock advantage for the Core i5-10200H (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core i5-10200H uses the Comet Lake-H (2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-6700 uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10200H scores 7,997 against the Core i7-6700's 8,048 — a 0.6% lead for the Core i7-6700. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-10200H vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-6700.

FeatureCore i5-10200HCore i7-6700
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 8
Boost Clock
4.1 GHz+2%
4 GHz
Base Clock
2.4 GHz
3.4 GHz+42%
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)
8 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Comet Lake-H (2020)
Skylake (2015−2016)
PassMark
7,997
8,048
Cinebench R23 Multi
5,372
Geekbench 6 Single
1,300
Geekbench 6 Multi
4,392
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-10200H uses the BGA1440 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-6700 uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-10200HCore i7-6700
Socket
BGA1440
LGA1151
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: Yes (Core i5-10200H) / not specified (Core i7-6700). The Core i5-10200H includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics), while the Core i7-6700 requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureCore i5-10200HCore i7-6700
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel UHD Graphics
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
Yes