Core i5-10200H vs Ryzen 5 2600H

Core i5-10200H vs Ryzen 5 2600H Performance Spectrum

Core i5-10200H

4 / 8

7,997

0.0%

8,002

+0.1%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-10200H vs Ryzen 5 2600H FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-10200H vs Ryzen 5 2600H: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-10200H

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics, while Ryzen 5 2600H needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (7,997 vs 8,002).

Ryzen 5 2600H

2018

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10200H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-10200H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 2600H better than Core i5-10200H?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i5-10200H is ahead with a 5.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 2600H pulls ahead with 0.1% better PassMark. Core i5-10200H also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 2600H is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 5 2600H still makes the most sense overall. Ryzen 5 2600H comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.1% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-10200H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2018) and 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i5-10200H vs Ryzen 5 2600H Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-10200H

The Core i5-10200H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 17 September 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-H (2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,997 points. Launch price was $149.

Ryzen 5 2600H

The Ryzen 5 2600H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 September 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Raven Ridge (2017−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 8,002 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-10200H and Ryzen 5 2600H share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the Core i5-10200H versus 3.6 GHz on the Ryzen 5 2600H — a 13% clock advantage for the Core i5-10200H (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i5-10200H uses the Comet Lake-H (2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 2600H uses Raven Ridge (2017−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10200H scores 7,997 against the Ryzen 5 2600H's 8,002 — a 0.1% lead for the Ryzen 5 2600H. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-10200H vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 2600H.

Feature	Core i5-10200H	Ryzen 5 2600H
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	4.1 GHz+14%	3.6 GHz
Base Clock	2.4 GHz	3.2 GHz+33%
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)+50%	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512 kB (per core)+100%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Comet Lake-H (2020)	Raven Ridge (2017−2019)
PassMark	7,997	8,002
Cinebench R23 Multi	5,372	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,300	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	4,392	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-10200H uses the BGA1440 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 2600H uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-10200H	Ryzen 5 2600H
Socket	BGA1440	FP5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2933	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: Yes (Core i5-10200H) / not specified (Ryzen 5 2600H). The Core i5-10200H includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics), while the Ryzen 5 2600H requires a dedicated GPU.