Core i5-10200H vs Xeon E3-1535M v6

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-10200H vs Xeon E3-1535M v6 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-10200H vs Xeon E3-1535M v6: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-10200H

2020

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics, while Xeon E3-1535M v6 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (7,997 vs 8,077).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).

Xeon E3-1535M v6

2017

Why buy it

✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-10200H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E3-1535M v6 better than Core i5-10200H?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E3-1535M v6 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-10200H is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E3-1535M v6 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E3-1535M v6 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E3-1535M v6 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon E3-1535M v6 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-10200H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2017). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i5-10200H vs Xeon E3-1535M v6 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-10200H

The Core i5-10200H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 17 September 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-H (2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,997 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E3-1535M v6

The Xeon E3-1535M v6 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 8,077 points. Launch price was $623.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-10200H and Xeon E3-1535M v6 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the Core i5-10200H versus 4.2 GHz on the Xeon E3-1535M v6 — a 2.4% clock advantage for the Xeon E3-1535M v6 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Core i5-10200H uses the Comet Lake-H (2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E3-1535M v6 uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10200H scores 7,997 against the Xeon E3-1535M v6's 8,077 — a 1% lead for the Xeon E3-1535M v6. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-10200H vs 8 MB on the Xeon E3-1535M v6.

Feature	Core i5-10200H	Xeon E3-1535M v6
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	4.1 GHz	4.2 GHz+2%
Base Clock	2.4 GHz	3.1 GHz+29%
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	8 MB+33%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+25500%	1 MB
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Comet Lake-H (2020)	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark	7,997	8,077+1%
Cinebench R23 Multi	5,372	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,300	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	4,392	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the BGA1440 socket with PCIe 3.0.

Feature	Core i5-10200H	Xeon E3-1535M v6
Socket	BGA1440	BGA1440
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2933	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: Yes (Core i5-10200H) / not specified (Xeon E3-1535M v6). The Core i5-10200H includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics), while the Xeon E3-1535M v6 requires a dedicated GPU.