Core i7-6700 vs Xeon X7560

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-6700 vs Xeon X7560 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-6700 vs Xeon X7560: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-6700

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 65W instead of 130W, a 65W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon X7560 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (8,048 vs 8,110).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 24 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon X7560, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $303 MSRP, while Xeon X7560 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon X7560

2010

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+200% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.

Trade-offs

❌100% higher power demand at 130W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon X7560 better than Core i7-6700?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon X7560 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-6700 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon X7560 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 7.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon X7560 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 200% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon X7560 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Xeon X7560 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $303 MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i7-6700 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2015 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (26.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1151.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-6700 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2010). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-6700 vs Xeon X7560 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-6700

The Core i7-6700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 July 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 8,048 points. Launch price was $303.

Xeon X7560

The Xeon X7560 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.27 GHz, with boost up to 2.67 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB L3 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1567. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-978, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, Speed-1066. Passmark benchmark score: 8,110 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-6700 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon X7560 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon X7560 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Core i7-6700 versus 2.67 GHz on the Xeon X7560 — a 39.9% clock advantage for the Core i7-6700 (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.27 GHz). The Core i7-6700 is built on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i7-6700 scores 8,048 against the Xeon X7560's 8,110 — a 0.8% lead for the Xeon X7560. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-6700 vs 24 MB L3 Cache on the Xeon X7560.

Feature	Core i7-6700	Xeon X7560
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	8 / 16+100%
Boost Clock	4 GHz+50%	2.67 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+50%	2.27 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	24 MB L3 Cache+200%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	—
Process	14 nm-69%	45 nm
Architecture	Skylake (2015−2016)	—
PassMark	8,048	8,110

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-6700 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon X7560 uses LGA1567 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-6700	Xeon X7560
Socket	LGA1151	LGA1567
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR3-1333
RAM Channels	—	4
ECC Support	—	Yes

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core i7-6700) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon X7560). Primary use case: Xeon X7560 targets Server. Direct competitor: Xeon X7560 rivals Core i7-980X.