Core i7-6700
VS
Xeon E5-2660

Core i7-6700 vs Xeon E5-2660

Intel

Core i7-6700

4 Cores8 Thrd65 WWMax: 4 GHz2015
VS
Intel

Xeon E5-2660

8 Cores16 Thrd95 WWMax: 3 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-6700 is positioned at rank 650 and the Xeon E5-2660 is on rank 963, so the Core i7-6700 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-6700

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
11736%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
11090%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
8052%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2426%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1921%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1681%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
963%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
950%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
865%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
865%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
855%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
832%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
821%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
817%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
810%
#388
Ryzen Embedded R2312
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
99%
#389
Ryzen Threadripper 7980X
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $5200
98%
#650
Core i7-6700
MSRP: $303|Avg: $143
100%
#651
Athlon II X4 631
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
100%
#652
Pentium G3240T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $15
100%
#653
Core i3-4160T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $18
99%
#657
Core i3-4350
MSRP: $138|Avg: $130
99%
#659
Core i5-6600T
MSRP: $213|Avg: $35
98%
#660
FX-4350
MSRP: $122|Avg: $140
98%
#661
Core i5-3570T
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
98%
#662
Core i5-6600K
MSRP: $242|Avg: $105
98%
#663
Core i5-4440
MSRP: $184|Avg: $101
98%
#664
Core i3-4370
MSRP: $149|Avg: $41
97%
#665
Core i5-7500T
MSRP: $202|Avg: $130
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2660

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
34238%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
6464%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
5743%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
4437%
#532
Xeon Platinum 8368Q
MSRP: $7719|Avg: $7719
100%
#533
Xeon Gold 6250
MSRP: $3400|Avg: $2000
100%
#534
Xeon E5-2699 v4
MSRP: $4115|Avg: $400
99%
#535
Xeon W-3245M
MSRP: $5002|Avg: $5002
94%
#536
Xeon W-3265M
MSRP: $6300|Avg: $3500
93%
#963
Xeon E5-2660
MSRP: $1329|Avg: $65
100%
#964
Xeon E5-2667 v3
MSRP: $2057|Avg: $150
100%
#966
Xeon E3110
MSRP: $214|Avg: $158
100%
#969
Xeon L3406
MSRP: $189|Avg: $30
96%
#971
Xeon E5-2687W v2
MSRP: $2112|Avg: $62
96%
#972
Xeon L5430
MSRP: $390|Avg: $380
95%
#973
Xeon E5-2470
MSRP: $1440|Avg: $125
95%
#974
Xeon E5-2670
MSRP: $1552|Avg: $60
95%
#976
Xeon X3470
MSRP: $589|Avg: $16
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($65) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon E5-2660 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightCore i7-6700Xeon E5-2660
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($143)
More affordable ($65)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Skylake (2015−2016) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i7-6700 ($143), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($78 less, 120% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightCore i7-6700Xeon E5-2660
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+121%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($143)
More affordable ($65)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-6700 and Xeon E5-2660

Intel

Core i7-6700

The Core i7-6700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 July 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 8,048 points. Launch price was $303.

Intel

Xeon E5-2660

The Xeon E5-2660 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 March 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 20480 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 8,067 points. Launch price was $85.

Processing Power

The Core i7-6700 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2660 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-2660 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Core i7-6700 versus 3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2660 — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Core i7-6700 (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core i7-6700 uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-2660 uses Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-6700 scores 8,048 against the Xeon E5-2660's 8,067 — a 0.2% lead for the Xeon E5-2660. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-6700 vs 20480 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-2660.

FeatureCore i7-6700Xeon E5-2660
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
8 / 16+100%
Boost Clock
4 GHz+33%
3 GHz
Base Clock
3.4 GHz+55%
2.2 GHz
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
20480 kB (total)+150%
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
14 nm-56%
32 nm
Architecture
Skylake (2015−2016)
Sandy Bridge-EP (2012)
PassMark
8,048
8,067
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-6700 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2660 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-6700Xeon E5-2660
Socket
LGA1151
LGA2011
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
384 GB
RAM Channels
4
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
40
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-6700 launched at $303 MSRP, while the Xeon E5-2660 debuted at $1329. At current prices ($143 vs $65), the Xeon E5-2660 is $78 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-6700 delivers 56.3 pts/$ vs 124.1 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2660 — making the Xeon E5-2660 the 75.2% better value option.

FeatureCore i7-6700Xeon E5-2660
MSRP
$303-77%
$1329
Avg Price (30d)
$143
$65-55%
Performance per Dollar
56.3
124.1+120%
Release Date
2015
2012