
Core i7-6700

Xeon E5-2660
Core i7-6700 vs Xeon E5-2660 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-6700 vs Xeon E5-2660 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-6700 vs Xeon E5-2660: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-6700
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,026 less on MSRP ($303 MSRP vs $1,329 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 337.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 26.6 vs 6.1 PassMark/$ ($303 MSRP vs $1,329 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2660 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (8,048 vs 8,067).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2660, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.
Xeon E5-2660
2012Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+150% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 0.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.1 vs 26.6 PassMark/$ ($1,329 MSRP vs $303 MSRP).
- ❌46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E5-2660 better than Core i7-6700?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-6700 vs Xeon E5-2660 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-6700
The Core i7-6700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 July 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 8,048 points. Launch price was $303.

Xeon E5-2660
The Xeon E5-2660 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 March 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 20480 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 8,067 points. Launch price was $85.
Processing Power
The Core i7-6700 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2660 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-2660 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Core i7-6700 versus 3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2660 — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Core i7-6700 (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core i7-6700 uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-2660 uses Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-6700 scores 8,048 against the Xeon E5-2660's 8,067 — a 0.2% lead for the Xeon E5-2660. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-6700 vs 20480 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-2660.
| Feature | Core i7-6700 | Xeon E5-2660 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 8 / 16+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz+33% | 3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+55% | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 20480 kB (total)+150% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-56% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Skylake (2015−2016) | Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) |
| PassMark | 8,048 | 8,067 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-6700 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2660 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-6700 | Xeon E5-2660 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR3-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 384 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 4 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 40 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-6700 was priced at $303, while the Xeon E5-2660 came in at $1329. On launch pricing ($303 vs $1329), Core i7-6700 was $1026 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-6700 delivers 26.6 pts/$ vs 6.1 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2660 — making the Core i7-6700 the 125.6% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-6700 | Xeon E5-2660 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $303-77% | $1329 |
| Performance per Dollar | 26.6+336% | 6.1 |
| Release Date | 2015 | 2012 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














