Core i7-6700 vs Ryzen Embedded V1807B

Intel

Core i7-6700

4 Cores8 Thrd65 WWMax: 4 GHz2015
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Ryzen Embedded V1807B

4 Cores8 Thrd45 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2018
Similar parts
·······

Core i7-6700 vs Ryzen Embedded V1807B Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-6700 vs Ryzen Embedded V1807B FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-6700 vs Ryzen Embedded V1807B: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-6700

2015

Why buy it

  • +300% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 2 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Embedded V1807B across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (8,048 vs 8,069).
  • 1% HIGHER MSRP
    $303 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
  • 44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.

Ryzen Embedded V1807B

2018

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +3.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Costs $3 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $303 MSRP).
  • Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 8 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Embedded V1807B better than Core i7-6700?
Yes. Ryzen Embedded V1807B is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Ryzen Embedded V1807B is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Embedded V1807B is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen Embedded V1807B is the better buy right now. Ryzen Embedded V1807B comes in $3 cheaper on MSRP at $300 MSRP versus $303 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 1.3% better value on MSRP (26.9 vs 26.6 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen Embedded V1807B makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2015) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-6700 vs Ryzen Embedded V1807B Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i7-6700

The Core i7-6700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 July 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 8,048 points. Launch price was $303.

AMD

Ryzen Embedded V1807B

The Ryzen Embedded V1807B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 February 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.35 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 8,069 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-6700 and Ryzen Embedded V1807B share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Core i7-6700 versus 3.8 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded V1807B — a 5.1% clock advantage for the Core i7-6700 (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.35 GHz). The Core i7-6700 uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded V1807B uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-6700 scores 8,048 against the Ryzen Embedded V1807B's 8,069 — a 0.3% lead for the Ryzen Embedded V1807B. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-6700 vs 2 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded V1807B.

FeatureCore i7-6700Ryzen Embedded V1807B
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 8
Boost Clock
4 GHz+5%
3.8 GHz
Base Clock
3.4 GHz+1%
3.35 GHz
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)+300%
2 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
512K (per core)+100%
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Skylake (2015−2016)
Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark
8,048
8,069
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-6700 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen Embedded V1807B uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-6700Ryzen Embedded V1807B
Socket
LGA1151
FP5
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-6700 was priced at $303, while the Ryzen Embedded V1807B came in at $300. On launch pricing ($303 vs $300), Ryzen Embedded V1807B was $3 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-6700 delivers 26.6 pts/$ vs 26.9 pts/$ for the Ryzen Embedded V1807B — making the Ryzen Embedded V1807B the 1.3% better value option.

FeatureCore i7-6700Ryzen Embedded V1807B
MSRP
$303
$300
Performance per Dollar
26.6
26.9+1%
Release Date
2015
2018

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.