Core i7-6700 vs Core i7-10810U

Intel

Core i7-6700

4 Cores8 Thrd65 WWMax: 4 GHz2015
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core i7-10810U

6 Cores12 Thrd25 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2020
Core family
·······

Core i7-6700 vs Core i7-10810U Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-6700 vs Core i7-10810U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-6700 vs Core i7-10810U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-6700

2015

Why buy it

  • +0.8% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-10810U across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
  • Launch MSRP is still $303 MSRP, while Core i7-10810U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 160% higher power demand at 65W vs 25W.

Core i7-10810U

2020

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +22.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
  • Draws 25W instead of 65W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (7,987 vs 8,048).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-10810U better than Core i7-6700?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i7-10810U is ahead with a 22.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-6700 pulls ahead with 0.8% better PassMark. Core i7-10810U also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-6700 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i7-10810U is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core i7-10810U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $303 MSRP, and it still gives you a 22.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i7-6700 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2015 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (26.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1151.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-10810U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2015) and 50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-6700 vs Core i7-10810U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i7-6700

The Core i7-6700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 July 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 8,048 points. Launch price was $303.

Intel

Core i7-10810U

The Core i7-10810U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-U (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1528. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,987 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Core i7-6700 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i7-10810U offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i7-10810U has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Core i7-6700 versus 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-10810U — a 20.2% clock advantage for the Core i7-10810U (base: 3.4 GHz vs 1.1 GHz). The Core i7-6700 uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-10810U uses Comet Lake-U (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-6700 scores 8,048 against the Core i7-10810U's 7,987 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i7-6700. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-6700 vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-10810U.

FeatureCore i7-6700Core i7-10810U
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
6 / 12+50%
Boost Clock
4 GHz
4.9 GHz+23%
Base Clock
3.4 GHz+209%
1.1 GHz
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
12 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Skylake (2015−2016)
Comet Lake-U (2019−2020)
PassMark
8,048
7,987
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-6700 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-10810U uses FCBGA1528 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-6700Core i7-10810U
Socket
LGA1151
FCBGA1528
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0