PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-11370H vs Xeon E5-2670 v2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-11370H vs Xeon E5-2670 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-11370H

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $1,130 less on MSRP ($426 MSRP vs $1,556 MSRP).
✅Delivers 271.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 27.1 vs 7.3 PassMark/$ ($426 MSRP vs $1,556 MSRP).
✅Draws 28W instead of 115W, a 87W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe Graphics (96 EU), while Xeon E5-2670 v2 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 25 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2670 v2, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.

Xeon E5-2670 v2

2013

Why buy it

✅+108.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅100% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-11370H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (11,346 vs 11,548).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.3 vs 27.1 PassMark/$ ($1,556 MSRP vs $426 MSRP).
❌310.7% higher power demand at 115W vs 28W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-11370H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-11370H better than Xeon E5-2670 v2?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2670 v2 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-11370H is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-11370H is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-11370H is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.8% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-11370H is the better buy right now. Core i7-11370H comes in $1,130 cheaper on MSRP at $426 MSRP versus $1,556 MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 271.8% better value on MSRP (27.1 vs 7.3 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-11370H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2013), more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 10/20, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-11370H vs Xeon E5-2670 v2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-11370H

The Core i7-11370H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 January 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-H35 (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1449. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 11,548 points. Launch price was $426.

Xeon E5-2670 v2

The Xeon E5-2670 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 11,346 points. Launch price was $927.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-11370H packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2670 v2 offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon E5-2670 v2 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core i7-11370H versus 3.3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2670 v2 — a 37% clock advantage for the Core i7-11370H (base: 3 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i7-11370H uses the Tiger Lake-H35 (2021) architecture (10 nm SuperFin), while the Xeon E5-2670 v2 uses Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-11370H scores 11,548 against the Xeon E5-2670 v2's 11,346 — a 1.8% lead for the Core i7-11370H. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-11370H vs 25 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2670 v2.

Feature	Core i7-11370H	Xeon E5-2670 v2
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	10 / 20+150%
Boost Clock	4.8 GHz+45%	3.3 GHz
Base Clock	3 GHz+20%	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	25 MB (total)+108%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+400%	256 kB (per core)
Process	10 nm SuperFin-55%	22 nm
Architecture	Tiger Lake-H35 (2021)	Ivy Bridge-EP (2013)
PassMark	11,548+2%	11,346
Cinebench R23 Multi	5,563	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,960	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	5,612	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-11370H uses the FCBGA1449 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2670 v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Core i7-11370H versus DDR3-1866 on the Xeon E5-2670 v2 — the Core i7-11370H supports 71.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5-2670 v2 supports up to 768 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 1100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-11370H) vs 4 (Xeon E5-2670 v2). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-11370H) vs 40 (Xeon E5-2670 v2) — the Xeon E5-2670 v2 offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Core i7-11370H) and Intel X79,Intel C602 (Xeon E5-2670 v2).

Feature	Core i7-11370H	Xeon E5-2670 v2
Socket	FCBGA1449	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200+71%	DDR3-1866
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	768 GB+1100%
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	40+100%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-11370H) / not specified (Xeon E5-2670 v2). The Core i7-11370H includes integrated graphics (Iris Xe Graphics (96 EU)), while the Xeon E5-2670 v2 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-11370H targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Core i7-11370H rivals Ryzen 7 5800H.

Feature	Core i7-11370H	Xeon E5-2670 v2
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Iris Xe Graphics (96 EU)	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	Yes	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	—
Target Use	Productivity	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-11370H was priced at $426, while the Xeon E5-2670 v2 came in at $1556. On launch pricing ($426 vs $1556), Core i7-11370H was $1130 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-11370H delivers 27.1 pts/$ vs 7.3 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2670 v2 — making the Core i7-11370H the 115.2% better value option.

Feature	Core i7-11370H	Xeon E5-2670 v2
MSRP	$426-73%	$1556
Performance per Dollar	27.1+271%	7.3
Release Date	2021	2013

Search Core i7-11370H on Amazon

Search Xeon E5-2670 v2 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.