Core i7-11600H vs Ryzen 7 2700

Core i7-11600H vs Ryzen 7 2700 Performance Spectrum

Core i7-11600H

6 / 12

15,441

0.0%

15,633

+1.2%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX

Ryzen 9 8940HX

Ryzen 9 9950X3D

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-11600H vs Ryzen 7 2700 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-11600H vs Ryzen 7 2700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-11600H

2021

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics, while Ryzen 7 2700 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 2700 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (15,441 vs 15,633).

Ryzen 7 2700

2018

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Core i7-11600H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-11600H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 2700 better than Core i7-11600H?

Yes. Ryzen 7 2700 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 5.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.2% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 2700 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 5.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 2700 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 2700 is the better buy right now. Ryzen 7 2700 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $299 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (52.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-11600H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2018). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-11600H vs Ryzen 7 2700 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-11600H

The Core i7-11600H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake H45 (2021) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1787. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 15,441 points. Launch price was $395.

Ryzen 7 2700

The Ryzen 7 2700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 15,633 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-11600H packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 2700 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 2700 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i7-11600H versus 4.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 2700 — a 11.5% clock advantage for the Core i7-11600H (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i7-11600H uses the Tiger Lake H45 (2021) architecture (10 nm SuperFin), while the Ryzen 7 2700 uses Zen+ (2018−2019) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-11600H scores 15,441 against the Ryzen 7 2700's 15,633 — a 1.2% lead for the Ryzen 7 2700. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i7-11600H vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 2700.

Feature	Core i7-11600H	Ryzen 7 2700
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	8 / 16+33%
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz+12%	4.1 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	3.2 GHz+28%
L3 Cache	18 MB (total)+13%	16 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	512K (per core)+40860%
Process	10 nm SuperFin-17%	12 nm
Architecture	Tiger Lake H45 (2021)	Zen+ (2018−2019)
PassMark	15,441	15,633+1%
Geekbench 6 Single	1,903	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-11600H uses the FCBGA1787 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 2700 uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-11600H	Ryzen 7 2700
Socket	FCBGA1787	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-11600H) / not specified (Ryzen 7 2700). The Core i7-11600H includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics), while the Ryzen 7 2700 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-11600H targets Gaming Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i7-11600H rivals Ryzen 5 5600H.