Core i7-11600H vs Xeon D-1746TER

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-11600H vs Xeon D-1746TER FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-11600H vs Xeon D-1746TER: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-11600H

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+20% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 15 MB).
✅Draws 35W instead of 67W, a 32W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics, while Xeon D-1746TER needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (15,441 vs 15,660).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-1746TER, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.

Xeon D-1746TER

2022

Why buy it

✅+1.4% higher PassMark.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-11600H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (15 MB vs 18 MB).
❌91.4% higher power demand at 67W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-11600H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon D-1746TER better than Core i7-11600H?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon D-1746TER makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-11600H is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon D-1746TER is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.4% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 20 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon D-1746TER still makes the most sense overall. Xeon D-1746TER comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1.4% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon D-1746TER makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2021) and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 20 threads instead of 6/12. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-11600H vs Xeon D-1746TER Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-11600H

The Core i7-11600H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake H45 (2021) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1787. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 15,441 points. Launch price was $395.

Xeon D-1746TER

The Xeon D-1746TER is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2227. Thermal design power (TDP): 67 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 15,660 points. Launch price was $1,069.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-11600H packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon D-1746TER offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon D-1746TER has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i7-11600H versus 3.1 GHz on the Xeon D-1746TER — a 39% clock advantage for the Core i7-11600H (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i7-11600H uses the Tiger Lake H45 (2021) architecture (10 nm SuperFin), while the Xeon D-1746TER uses Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-11600H scores 15,441 against the Xeon D-1746TER's 15,660 — a 1.4% lead for the Xeon D-1746TER. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i7-11600H vs 15 MB (total) on the Xeon D-1746TER.

Feature	Core i7-11600H	Xeon D-1746TER
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	10 / 20+67%
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz+48%	3.1 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz+25%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	18 MB (total)+20%	15 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	1.25 MB (per core)
Process	10 nm SuperFin	10 nm
Architecture	Tiger Lake H45 (2021)	Ice Lake-D (2022−2023)
PassMark	15,441	15,660+1%
Geekbench 6 Single	1,903	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-11600H uses the FCBGA1787 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon D-1746TER uses FCBGA2227 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-11600H	Xeon D-1746TER
Socket	FCBGA1787	FCBGA2227
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-11600H) / not specified (Xeon D-1746TER). The Core i7-11600H includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics), while the Xeon D-1746TER requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-11600H targets Gaming Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i7-11600H rivals Ryzen 5 5600H.