Core i7-1165G7 vs Xeon E7450

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-1165G7 vs Xeon E7450 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-1165G7 vs Xeon E7450: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-1165G7

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +13.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 28W instead of 90W, a 62W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe Graphics 96EU, while Xeon E7450 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (9,863 vs 9,932).

Xeon E7450

2008

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-1165G7 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $417 MSRP, while Core i7-1165G7 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌221.4% higher power demand at 90W vs 28W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-1165G7 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-1165G7 better than Xeon E7450?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E7450 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-1165G7 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E7450 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-1165G7 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E7450 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core i7-1165G7 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $417 MSRP, and it still gives you a 13.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon E7450 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.7% better PassMark. Xeon E7450 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (23.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-1165G7 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2008) and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-1165G7 vs Xeon E7450 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-1165G7

The Core i7-1165G7 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 September 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-UP3 (2020−2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1449. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 9,863 points. Launch price was $426.

Xeon E7450

The Xeon E7450 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. Base frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB L3 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA604. Thermal design power (TDP): 90 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 9,932 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-1165G7 is built on the Tiger Lake-UP3 (2020−2021) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i7-1165G7 scores 9,863 against the Xeon E7450's 9,932 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon E7450. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-1165G7 vs 12 MB L3 Cache on the Xeon E7450.

Feature	Core i7-1165G7	Xeon E7450
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	—
Boost Clock	4.7 GHz	—
Base Clock	2.8 GHz+17%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	12 MB L3 Cache
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	—
Process	10 nm SuperFin-78%	45 nm
Architecture	Tiger Lake-UP3 (2020−2021)	—
PassMark	9,863	9,932
Geekbench 6 Single	1,809	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-1165G7 uses the FCBGA1449 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E7450 uses PGA604 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-1165G7	Xeon E7450
Socket	FCBGA1449	PGA604
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+100%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR4x-4267	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	4	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-1165G7) / not specified (Xeon E7450). The Core i7-1165G7 includes integrated graphics (Iris Xe Graphics 96EU), while the Xeon E7450 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-1165G7 targets Mainstream Ultrabook. Direct competitor: Core i7-1165G7 rivals Ryzen 7 5700U.