Core i7-1165G7 vs Core i7-11390H

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-1165G7 vs Core i7-11390H FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-1165G7 vs Core i7-11390H: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-1165G7

2020

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-11390H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Core i7-11390H

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +12.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅400% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (9,798 vs 9,863).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-1165G7 better than Core i7-11390H?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i7-11390H is ahead with a 12.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-1165G7 pulls ahead with 0.7% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-1165G7 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-1165G7 still makes the most sense overall. Core i7-1165G7 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.7% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-11390H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2020). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-1165G7 vs Core i7-11390H Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-1165G7

The Core i7-1165G7 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 September 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-UP3 (2020−2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1449. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 9,863 points. Launch price was $426.

Core i7-11390H

The Core i7-11390H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 June 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-H35 (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1449. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 9,798 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-1165G7 and Core i7-11390H share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Core i7-1165G7 versus 5 GHz on the Core i7-11390H — a 6.2% clock advantage for the Core i7-11390H (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core i7-1165G7 uses the Tiger Lake-UP3 (2020−2021) architecture (10 nm SuperFin), while the Core i7-11390H uses Tiger Lake-H35 (2021) (10 nm SuperFin). In PassMark, the Core i7-1165G7 scores 9,863 against the Core i7-11390H's 9,798 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i7-1165G7. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,809 vs 1,948, a 7.4% lead for the Core i7-11390H that directly translates to higher frame rates. Both processors carry 12 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Core i7-1165G7	Core i7-11390H
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	4.7 GHz	5 GHz+6%
Base Clock	2.8 GHz	2.9 GHz+4%
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	12 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	1.25 MB (per core)
Process	10 nm SuperFin	10 nm SuperFin
Architecture	Tiger Lake-UP3 (2020−2021)	Tiger Lake-H35 (2021)
PassMark	9,863	9,798
Geekbench 6 Single	1,809	1,948+8%

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the FCBGA1449 socket with PCIe 4.0. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR4x-4267 on the Core i7-1165G7 versus DDR4-3200 on the Core i7-11390H — the Core i7-1165G7 supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 64 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 4 (Core i7-1165G7) vs 20 (Core i7-11390H) — the Core i7-11390H offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Tiger Lake-UP3 (Core i7-1165G7) and HM570,QC570,WM590 (Core i7-11390H).

Feature	Core i7-1165G7	Core i7-11390H
Socket	FCBGA1449	FCBGA1449
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR4x-4267+33%	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	64 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	4	20+400%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d, EPT virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — Iris Xe Graphics 96EU (Core i7-1165G7) and Iris Xe Graphics 96EU (Core i7-11390H) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-1165G7 targets Mainstream Ultrabook, Core i7-11390H targets Thin & Light Gaming Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i7-1165G7 rivals Ryzen 7 5700U; Core i7-11390H rivals Ryzen 7 5800U.

Feature	Core i7-1165G7	Core i7-11390H
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Iris Xe Graphics 96EU	Iris Xe Graphics 96EU
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	Mainstream Ultrabook	Thin & Light Gaming Laptop