
Core i7-11700F

EPYC 7262
Core i7-11700F vs EPYC 7262 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-11700F vs EPYC 7262 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-11700F vs EPYC 7262: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-11700F
2021Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +27.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Draws 65W instead of 155W, a 90W reduction.
- β Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike EPYC 7262.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark (20,770 vs 20,779).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
- βLess compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7262, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
- βLaunch MSRP is still $298 MSRP, while EPYC 7262 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
EPYC 7262
2019Why buy it
- β +0% higher PassMark.
- β +100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- β Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- β 540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-11700F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β138.5% higher power demand at 155W vs 65W.
- βNo boxed cooler included, unlike Core i7-11700F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-11700F better than EPYC 7262?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-11700F vs EPYC 7262 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-11700F
The Core i7-11700F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 20,770 points. Launch price was $299.

EPYC 7262
The EPYC 7262 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017β2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 20,779 points. Launch price was $575.
Processing Power
Both the Core i7-11700F and EPYC 7262 share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-11700F versus 3.4 GHz on the EPYC 7262 β a 36.1% clock advantage for the Core i7-11700F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i7-11700F uses the Rocket Lake (2021) architecture (14 nm), while the EPYC 7262 uses Zen 2 (2017β2020) (7 nm, 14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-11700F scores 20,770 against the EPYC 7262's 20,779 β a 0% lead for the EPYC 7262. Geekbench 6 single-core β the metric most relevant to gaming β records 2,196 vs 1,346, a 48% lead for the Core i7-11700F that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Core i7-11700F vs 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 7262.
| Feature | Core i7-11700F | EPYC 7262 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+44% | 3.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.2 GHz+28% |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 32 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512 kB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm, 14 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Rocket Lake (2021) | Zen 2 (2017β2020) |
| PassMark | 20,770 | 20,779 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | β | 11,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,196+63% | 1,346 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | β | 7,900 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-11700F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 7262 uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. The EPYC 7262 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB β 3100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-11700F) vs 8 (EPYC 7262). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-11700F) vs 128 (EPYC 7262) β the EPYC 7262 offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H510,B560,H570,Z590,Q570 (Core i7-11700F) and SP3,Rome (EPYC 7262).
| Feature | Core i7-11700F | EPYC 7262 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | SP3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 4096 GB+3100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 128+540% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Core i7-11700F supports AVX-512 instructions β important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-11700F) vs AMD-V, SEV (EPYC 7262). Primary use case: Core i7-11700F targets Gaming Desktop, EPYC 7262 targets Budget Server / Multi-thread computing. Direct competitor: Core i7-11700F rivals Ryzen 7 5800; EPYC 7262 rivals Xeon Silver 4216.
| Feature | Core i7-11700F | EPYC 7262 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | β |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | AMD-V, SEV |
| Target Use | Gaming Desktop | Budget Server / Multi-thread computing |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















