Core i7-1265U
VS
Ryzen 3 210

Core i7-1265U vs Ryzen 3 210

Intel

Core i7-1265U

10 Cores12 Thrd15 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2022
VS
AMD

Ryzen 3 210

4 Cores8 Thrd28 WWMax: 4.7 GHz2025

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-1265U

#184
Core Ultra 7 266V
MSRP: $520|Avg: $520
126%
#185
Ryzen 7 5825C
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
123%
#187
Core Ultra 9 288V
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
114%
#188
Core i7-10870H
MSRP: $417|Avg: N/A
114%
#198
Core i7-1265U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 3 210

#10
Ryzen 7 260
MSRP: $199|Avg: $70
107%
#13
Ryzen 3 210
MSRP: $99|Avg: $99
100%
#14
Ryzen 5 PRO 230
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
98%
#15
Ryzen 5 220
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
94%
#18
Ryzen 5 8500G
MSRP: $179|Avg: $150
90%
#27
Core Ultra 7 265HX
MSRP: $450|Avg: N/A
82%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core i7-1265U delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Ryzen 3 210 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.6% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore i7-1265URyzen 3 210
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($99)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Alder Lake-U (2022) / Intel 7 nm)
✨ Modern (Hawk Point (2024−2025) / 4 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i7-1265URyzen 3 210
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($99)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-1265U and Ryzen 3 210

Intel

Core i7-1265U

The Core i7-1265U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 February 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-U (2022) architecture. It features 10 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 13,282 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

Ryzen 3 210

The Ryzen 3 210 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 13,209 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Core i7-1265U packs 10 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 3 210 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i7-1265U has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core i7-1265U versus 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 3 210 — a 2.1% clock advantage for the Core i7-1265U (base: 1.8 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i7-1265U uses the Alder Lake-U (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 3 210 uses Hawk Point (2024−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-1265U scores 13,282 against the Ryzen 3 210's 13,209 — a 0.6% lead for the Core i7-1265U. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-1265U vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 210.

FeatureCore i7-1265URyzen 3 210
Cores / Threads
10 / 12+150%
4 / 8
Boost Clock
4.8 GHz+2%
4.7 GHz
Base Clock
1.8 GHz
3 GHz+67%
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)+50%
8 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)+25%
1 MB (per core)
Process
Intel 7 nm
4 nm-43%
Architecture
Alder Lake-U (2022)
Hawk Point (2024−2025)
PassMark
13,282
13,209
Cinebench R23 Multi
515
Geekbench 6 Single
2,300
Geekbench 6 Multi
6,500
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-1265U uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 3 210 uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-1265URyzen 3 210
Socket
FCBGA1744
FP7
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-5600
Max RAM Capacity
256 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
14
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core i7-1265U) / AMD-V (Ryzen 3 210). The Ryzen 3 210 includes integrated graphics (Radeon 740M), while the Core i7-1265U requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 3 210 targets Laptop.

FeatureCore i7-1265URyzen 3 210
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon 740M
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
Yes
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Laptop