
Core i7-13700K
Popular choices:

Core Ultra 7 258V
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-13700K
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +37.0% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+150% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Costs $41 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 165.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 42.1 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
- ✅150% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌635.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 17W.
Core Ultra 7 258V
2024Why buy it
- ✅Draws 17W instead of 125W, a 108W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (10,000 vs 31,000).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 30 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 42.1 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($450 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
Core i7-13700K
2022Core Ultra 7 258V
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +37.0% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+150% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Costs $41 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 165.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 42.1 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
- ✅150% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 17W instead of 125W, a 108W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌635.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 17W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (10,000 vs 31,000).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 30 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 42.1 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($450 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-13700K better than Core Ultra 7 258V?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Core Ultra 7 258V |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 284 FPS | 272 FPS |
| medium | 268 FPS | 243 FPS |
| high | 223 FPS | 205 FPS |
| ultra | 190 FPS | 176 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 238 FPS | 230 FPS |
| medium | 200 FPS | 185 FPS |
| high | 159 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 161 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 103 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 89 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Core Ultra 7 258V |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 689 FPS | 217 FPS |
| medium | 580 FPS | 179 FPS |
| high | 484 FPS | 161 FPS |
| ultra | 439 FPS | 142 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 595 FPS | 184 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 157 FPS |
| high | 441 FPS | 145 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 125 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 348 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 314 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 295 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 261 FPS | 102 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Core Ultra 7 258V |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 648 FPS | 474 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 474 FPS |
| high | 467 FPS | 474 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 474 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 591 FPS | 474 FPS |
| medium | 491 FPS | 474 FPS |
| high | 427 FPS | 474 FPS |
| ultra | 371 FPS | 468 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 474 FPS |
| medium | 374 FPS | 462 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 404 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 336 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Core Ultra 7 258V |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 970 FPS | 474 FPS |
| medium | 883 FPS | 474 FPS |
| high | 766 FPS | 474 FPS |
| ultra | 689 FPS | 474 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 829 FPS | 474 FPS |
| medium | 740 FPS | 474 FPS |
| high | 642 FPS | 474 FPS |
| ultra | 566 FPS | 474 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 567 FPS | 474 FPS |
| medium | 515 FPS | 474 FPS |
| high | 463 FPS | 474 FPS |
| ultra | 404 FPS | 418 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13700K and Core Ultra 7 258V

Core i7-13700K
Core i7-13700K
The Core i7-13700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,784 points. Launch price was $409.

Core Ultra 7 258V
Core Ultra 7 258V
The Core Ultra 7 258V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2.5 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2833. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 18,947 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i7-13700K packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Core Ultra 7 258V offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the Core i7-13700K has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700K versus 4.8 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 258V — a 11.8% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700K (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core i7-13700K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core Ultra 7 258V uses Lunar Lake (2024) (3 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700K scores 45,784 against the Core Ultra 7 258V's 18,947 — a 82.9% lead for the Core i7-13700K. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 31,000 vs 10,000 (102.4% advantage for the Core i7-13700K). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,846 vs 2,750, a 3.4% lead for the Core i7-13700K that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 18,980 vs 11,000 (53.2% advantage for the Core i7-13700K). L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700K vs 12 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 258V.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Core Ultra 7 258V |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 24+100% | 8 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+13% | 4.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+55% | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total)+150% | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 2.5 MB (per core)+25% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 3 nm-57% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) | Lunar Lake (2024) |
| PassMark | 45,784+142% | 18,947 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 31,000+210% | 10,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,846+3% | 2,750 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 18,980+73% | 11,000 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-13700K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core Ultra 7 258V uses FCBGA2833 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. The Core i7-13700K supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 142.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-13700K) vs 8 (Core Ultra 7 258V) — the Core i7-13700K offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel Z790,Intel H770,Intel B760,Intel Z690,Intel H670,Intel B660,Intel H610 (Core i7-13700K) and Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 7 258V).
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Core Ultra 7 258V |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FCBGA2833 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | LPDDR5X-8533 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+500% | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20+150% | 8 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i7-13700K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: true (Core i7-13700K) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 7 258V). Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics 770 (Core i7-13700K) and Arc 140V (Core Ultra 7 258V) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 7 258V targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700K rivals Ryzen 9 7900X; Core Ultra 7 258V rivals Ryzen 7 8840U.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Core Ultra 7 258V |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | Arc 140V |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Gaming |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-13700K launched at $409 MSRP, while the Core Ultra 7 258V debuted at $450. On MSRP ($409 vs $450), the Core i7-13700K is $41 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-13700K delivers 111.9 pts/$ vs 42.1 pts/$ for the Core Ultra 7 258V — making the Core i7-13700K the 90.7% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Core Ultra 7 258V |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $409-9% | $450 |
| Performance per Dollar | 111.9+166% | 42.1 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













