
Core i7-13700K
Popular choices:

EPYC 9184X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-13700K
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.0% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $4,519 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $4,928 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1057.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 9.7 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $4,928 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 320W, a 195W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while EPYC 9184X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (45,784 vs 47,665).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 768 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9184X, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
EPYC 9184X
2023Why buy it
- ✅+4.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅+2460% larger total L3 cache (768 MB vs 30 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.7 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($4,928 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ❌156% higher power demand at 320W vs 125W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-13700K
2022EPYC 9184X
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.0% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $4,519 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $4,928 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1057.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 9.7 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $4,928 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 320W, a 195W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while EPYC 9184X needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅+4.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅+2460% larger total L3 cache (768 MB vs 30 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (45,784 vs 47,665).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 768 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9184X, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.7 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($4,928 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ❌156% higher power demand at 320W vs 125W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-13700K better than EPYC 9184X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | EPYC 9184X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 284 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 268 FPS | 138 FPS |
| high | 223 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 190 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 238 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 200 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 159 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 103 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 39 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | EPYC 9184X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 689 FPS | 576 FPS |
| medium | 580 FPS | 504 FPS |
| high | 484 FPS | 409 FPS |
| ultra | 439 FPS | 357 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 595 FPS | 484 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 431 FPS |
| high | 441 FPS | 360 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 298 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 348 FPS | 300 FPS |
| medium | 314 FPS | 271 FPS |
| high | 295 FPS | 244 FPS |
| ultra | 261 FPS | 219 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | EPYC 9184X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 648 FPS | 746 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 632 FPS |
| high | 467 FPS | 575 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 506 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 591 FPS | 557 FPS |
| medium | 491 FPS | 470 FPS |
| high | 427 FPS | 420 FPS |
| ultra | 371 FPS | 364 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 402 FPS |
| medium | 374 FPS | 321 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 284 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 228 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | EPYC 9184X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 970 FPS | 958 FPS |
| medium | 883 FPS | 867 FPS |
| high | 766 FPS | 738 FPS |
| ultra | 689 FPS | 653 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 829 FPS | 754 FPS |
| medium | 740 FPS | 657 FPS |
| high | 642 FPS | 556 FPS |
| ultra | 566 FPS | 481 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 567 FPS | 534 FPS |
| medium | 515 FPS | 477 FPS |
| high | 463 FPS | 420 FPS |
| ultra | 404 FPS | 359 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13700K and EPYC 9184X

Core i7-13700K
Core i7-13700K
The Core i7-13700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,784 points. Launch price was $409.

EPYC 9184X
EPYC 9184X
The EPYC 9184X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Genoa-X (2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.55 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 768 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 47,665 points. Launch price was $4,928.
Processing Power
The Core i7-13700K packs 16 cores / 24 threads, matching the EPYC 9184X's 16 cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700K versus 4.2 GHz on the EPYC 9184X — a 25% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700K (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.55 GHz). The Core i7-13700K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the EPYC 9184X uses Genoa-X (2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700K scores 45,784 against the EPYC 9184X's 47,665 — a 4% lead for the EPYC 9184X. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700K vs 768 MB (total) on the EPYC 9184X.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | EPYC 9184X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 24 | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+29% | 4.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz | 3.55 GHz+4% |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total) | 768 MB (total)+2460% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 5 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) | Genoa-X (2023) |
| PassMark | 45,784 | 47,665+4% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 31,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,846 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 18,980 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-13700K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 9184X uses SP5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i7-13700K versus 4800 on the EPYC 9184X — the EPYC 9184X supports 199.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9184X supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 192 GB — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-13700K) vs 12 (EPYC 9184X). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-13700K) vs 128 (EPYC 9184X) — the EPYC 9184X offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel Z790,Intel H770,Intel B760,Intel Z690,Intel H670,Intel B660,Intel H610 (Core i7-13700K) and SP5 (EPYC 9184X).
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | EPYC 9184X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | SP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | 4800+95900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+3276700% | 6144 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 12+500% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 128+540% |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i7-13700K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the EPYC 9184X supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: true (Core i7-13700K) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 9184X). The Core i7-13700K includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the EPYC 9184X requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700K rivals Ryzen 9 7900X; EPYC 9184X rivals Xeon Platinum 8468X.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | EPYC 9184X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-13700K launched at $409 MSRP, while the EPYC 9184X debuted at $4928. On MSRP ($409 vs $4928), the Core i7-13700K is $4519 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-13700K delivers 111.9 pts/$ vs 9.7 pts/$ for the EPYC 9184X — making the Core i7-13700K the 168.2% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | EPYC 9184X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $409-92% | $4928 |
| Performance per Dollar | 111.9+1054% | 9.7 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













