
Core i7-13700K
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 9800X3D
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-13700K
2022Why buy it
- ✅+33.2% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅Costs $70 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $479 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 34.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 83.4 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $479 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 9800X3D across 45 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Ryzen 7 9800X3D
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.2% higher average FPS across 45 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (23,277 vs 31,000).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 83.4 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($479 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
Core i7-13700K
2022Ryzen 7 9800X3D
2024Why buy it
- ✅+33.2% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅Costs $70 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $479 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 34.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 83.4 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $479 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.2% higher average FPS across 45 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 9800X3D across 45 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (23,277 vs 31,000).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 83.4 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($479 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-13700K better than Ryzen 7 9800X3D?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 7 9800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 284 FPS | 276 FPS |
| medium | 268 FPS | 257 FPS |
| high | 223 FPS | 219 FPS |
| ultra | 190 FPS | 192 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 238 FPS | 260 FPS |
| medium | 200 FPS | 217 FPS |
| high | 159 FPS | 172 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 155 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 103 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 100 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 7 9800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 689 FPS | 880 FPS |
| medium | 580 FPS | 713 FPS |
| high | 484 FPS | 561 FPS |
| ultra | 439 FPS | 474 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 595 FPS | 697 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 591 FPS |
| high | 441 FPS | 483 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 383 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 348 FPS | 383 FPS |
| medium | 314 FPS | 328 FPS |
| high | 295 FPS | 305 FPS |
| ultra | 261 FPS | 263 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 7 9800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 648 FPS | 944 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 772 FPS |
| high | 467 FPS | 698 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 604 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 591 FPS | 731 FPS |
| medium | 491 FPS | 598 FPS |
| high | 427 FPS | 529 FPS |
| ultra | 371 FPS | 452 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 506 FPS |
| medium | 374 FPS | 419 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 377 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 316 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 7 9800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 970 FPS | 999 FPS |
| medium | 883 FPS | 999 FPS |
| high | 766 FPS | 907 FPS |
| ultra | 689 FPS | 811 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 829 FPS | 885 FPS |
| medium | 740 FPS | 778 FPS |
| high | 642 FPS | 685 FPS |
| ultra | 566 FPS | 592 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 567 FPS | 639 FPS |
| medium | 515 FPS | 568 FPS |
| high | 463 FPS | 507 FPS |
| ultra | 404 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13700K and Ryzen 7 9800X3D

Core i7-13700K
Core i7-13700K
The Core i7-13700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,784 points. Launch price was $409.


Ryzen 7 9800X3D
Ryzen 7 9800X3D
The Ryzen 7 9800X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 November 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Granite Ridge (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 96 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 39,966 points. Launch price was $479.
Processing Power
The Core i7-13700K packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen 7 9800X3D offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i7-13700K has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700K versus 5.2 GHz on the Ryzen 7 9800X3D — a 3.8% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700K (base: 3.4 GHz vs 4.7 GHz). The Core i7-13700K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 9800X3D uses Granite Ridge (2024−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700K scores 45,784 against the Ryzen 7 9800X3D's 39,966 — a 13.6% lead for the Core i7-13700K. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 31,000 vs 23,277 (28.5% advantage for the Core i7-13700K). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,846 vs 3,450, a 19.2% lead for the Ryzen 7 9800X3D that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 18,980 vs 18,500 (2.6% advantage for the Core i7-13700K). L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700K vs 96 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 9800X3D.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 7 9800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 24+100% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+4% | 5.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz | 4.7 GHz+38% |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total) | 96 MB (total)+220% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) | Granite Ridge (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 45,784+15% | 39,966 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 31,000+33% | 23,277 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,846 | 3,450+21% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 18,980+3% | 18,500 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-13700K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 9800X3D uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. Both support up to 192 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-13700K) vs 28 (Ryzen 7 9800X3D) — the Ryzen 7 9800X3D offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel Z790,Intel H770,Intel B760,Intel Z690,Intel H670,Intel B660,Intel H610 (Core i7-13700K) and X670E,B650E,X870E,B850 (Ryzen 7 9800X3D).
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 7 9800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | DDR5-5600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 192 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 28+40% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Ryzen 7 9800X3D supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: true (Core i7-13700K) vs AMD-V, AMD-Vi (Ryzen 7 9800X3D). Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics 770 (Core i7-13700K) and Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7 9800X3D) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 9800X3D targets Extreme Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700K rivals Ryzen 9 7900X; Ryzen 7 9800X3D rivals Core i9-14900K.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 7 9800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | Radeon Graphics |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | true | AMD-V, AMD-Vi |
| Target Use | — | Extreme Gaming |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-13700K launched at $409 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 9800X3D debuted at $479. On MSRP ($409 vs $479), the Core i7-13700K is $70 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-13700K delivers 111.9 pts/$ vs 83.4 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 9800X3D — making the Core i7-13700K the 29.2% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 7 9800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $409-15% | $479 |
| Performance per Dollar | 111.9+34% | 83.4 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












