
Core i7-13700K
Popular choices:

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-13700K
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +23.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+87.5% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $409 MSRP, while Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌346.4% higher power demand at 125W vs 28W.
Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
2024Why buy it
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 125W, a 97W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (22,246 vs 31,000).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 30 MB).
Core i7-13700K
2022Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +23.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+87.5% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 125W, a 97W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $409 MSRP, while Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌346.4% higher power demand at 125W vs 28W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (22,246 vs 31,000).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 30 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-13700K better than Ryzen AI 9 HX 375?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 284 FPS | 245 FPS |
| medium | 268 FPS | 230 FPS |
| high | 223 FPS | 192 FPS |
| ultra | 190 FPS | 165 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 238 FPS | 216 FPS |
| medium | 200 FPS | 184 FPS |
| high | 159 FPS | 148 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 130 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 103 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 86 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 689 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 580 FPS | 220 FPS |
| high | 484 FPS | 194 FPS |
| ultra | 439 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 595 FPS | 232 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 203 FPS |
| high | 441 FPS | 178 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 151 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 348 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 314 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 295 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 261 FPS | 115 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 648 FPS | 738 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 587 FPS |
| high | 467 FPS | 508 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 429 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 591 FPS | 661 FPS |
| medium | 491 FPS | 533 FPS |
| high | 427 FPS | 455 FPS |
| ultra | 371 FPS | 388 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 482 FPS |
| medium | 374 FPS | 403 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 359 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 301 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 970 FPS | 865 FPS |
| medium | 883 FPS | 809 FPS |
| high | 766 FPS | 694 FPS |
| ultra | 689 FPS | 625 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 829 FPS | 757 FPS |
| medium | 740 FPS | 680 FPS |
| high | 642 FPS | 583 FPS |
| ultra | 566 FPS | 515 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 567 FPS | 518 FPS |
| medium | 515 FPS | 473 FPS |
| high | 463 FPS | 420 FPS |
| ultra | 404 FPS | 369 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13700K and Ryzen AI 9 HX 375

Core i7-13700K
Core i7-13700K
The Core i7-13700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,784 points. Launch price was $409.


Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
The Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Julho 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Strix Point-HX (Zen 5) (2024) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 34,585 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The Core i7-13700K packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Core i7-13700K has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700K versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 — a 5.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700K (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i7-13700K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 uses Strix Point-HX (Zen 5) (2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700K scores 45,784 against the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375's 34,585 — a 27.9% lead for the Core i7-13700K. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 31,000 vs 22,246 (32.9% advantage for the Core i7-13700K). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,846 vs 2,865, a 0.7% lead for the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 18,980 vs 15,100 (22.8% advantage for the Core i7-13700K). L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700K vs 16 MB on the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 24+33% | 12 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+6% | 5.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+70% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total)+88% | 16 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) | Strix Point-HX (Zen 5) (2024) |
| PassMark | 45,784+32% | 34,585 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 31,000+39% | 22,246 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,846 | 2,865 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 18,980+26% | 15,100 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-13700K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. The Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 28.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-13700K) vs 16 (Ryzen AI 9 HX 375) — the Core i7-13700K offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel Z790,Intel H770,Intel B760,Intel Z690,Intel H670,Intel B660,Intel H610 (Core i7-13700K) and SoC (Ryzen AI 9 HX 375).
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | LPDDR5x-8000, DDR5-5600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 256 GB+33% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20+25% | 16 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i7-13700K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: true (Core i7-13700K) vs AMD-V, AMD-Vi (Ryzen AI 9 HX 375). Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics 770 (Core i7-13700K) and Radeon 890M (Ryzen AI 9 HX 375) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 targets AI-Notebook. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700K rivals Ryzen 9 7900X; Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 rivals Ryzen AI 9 HX 370.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | Radeon 890M |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | true | AMD-V, AMD-Vi |
| Target Use | — | AI-Notebook |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-13700K launched at $409 MSRP, while the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 debuted at $0. On MSRP ($409 vs $0), the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 is $409 cheaper.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $409 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 111.9 | — |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












