
Core i7-13700K
Popular choices:

Xeon 6780E
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-13700K
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +13.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $10,941 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $11,350 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1364.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 7.6 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $11,350 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 330W, a 205W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Xeon 6780E needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (45,784 vs 86,734).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 108 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon 6780E, which brings 144 cores / 144 threads and 88 PCIe lanes.
Xeon 6780E
2024Why buy it
- ✅+89.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅+260% larger total L3 cache (108 MB vs 30 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 144 cores / 144 threads, plus 88 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅340% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.6 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($11,350 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ❌164% higher power demand at 330W vs 125W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-13700K
2022Xeon 6780E
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +13.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $10,941 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $11,350 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1364.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 7.6 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $11,350 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 330W, a 205W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Xeon 6780E needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅+89.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅+260% larger total L3 cache (108 MB vs 30 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 144 cores / 144 threads, plus 88 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅340% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (45,784 vs 86,734).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 108 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon 6780E, which brings 144 cores / 144 threads and 88 PCIe lanes.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.6 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($11,350 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ❌164% higher power demand at 330W vs 125W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-13700K better than Xeon 6780E?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Xeon 6780E |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 284 FPS | 189 FPS |
| medium | 268 FPS | 152 FPS |
| high | 223 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 190 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 238 FPS | 153 FPS |
| medium | 200 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 159 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 103 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Xeon 6780E |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 689 FPS | 244 FPS |
| medium | 580 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 484 FPS | 178 FPS |
| ultra | 439 FPS | 142 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 595 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 441 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 120 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 348 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 314 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 295 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 261 FPS | 81 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Xeon 6780E |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 648 FPS | 934 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 831 FPS |
| high | 467 FPS | 779 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 693 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 591 FPS | 746 FPS |
| medium | 491 FPS | 655 FPS |
| high | 427 FPS | 614 FPS |
| ultra | 371 FPS | 546 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 479 FPS |
| medium | 374 FPS | 378 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 334 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 272 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Xeon 6780E |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 970 FPS | 897 FPS |
| medium | 883 FPS | 807 FPS |
| high | 766 FPS | 691 FPS |
| ultra | 689 FPS | 588 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 829 FPS | 697 FPS |
| medium | 740 FPS | 606 FPS |
| high | 642 FPS | 517 FPS |
| ultra | 566 FPS | 436 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 567 FPS | 500 FPS |
| medium | 515 FPS | 446 FPS |
| high | 463 FPS | 390 FPS |
| ultra | 404 FPS | 334 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13700K and Xeon 6780E

Core i7-13700K
Core i7-13700K
The Core i7-13700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,784 points. Launch price was $409.

Xeon 6780E
Xeon 6780E
The Xeon 6780E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sierra Forest (2024) architecture. It features 144 cores and 144 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 108 MB (total). L2 cache: 4 MB (per module). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 330 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 86,734 points. Launch price was $11,350.
Processing Power
The Core i7-13700K packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon 6780E offers 144 cores / 144 threads — the Xeon 6780E has 128 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700K versus 3 GHz on the Xeon 6780E — a 57.1% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700K (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core i7-13700K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon 6780E uses Sierra Forest (2024) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700K scores 45,784 against the Xeon 6780E's 86,734 — a 61.8% lead for the Xeon 6780E. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700K vs 108 MB (total) on the Xeon 6780E.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Xeon 6780E |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 24 | 144 / 144+800% |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+80% | 3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+55% | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total) | 108 MB (total)+260% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 4 MB (per module)+100% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | Intel 3 nm-57% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) | Sierra Forest (2024) |
| PassMark | 45,784 | 86,734+89% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 31,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,846 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 18,980 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-13700K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon 6780E uses LGA4710 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. The Core i7-13700K supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 4 TB — 191.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-13700K) vs 8 (Xeon 6780E). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-13700K) vs 88 (Xeon 6780E) — the Xeon 6780E offers 68 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Xeon 6780E |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA4710 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | DDR5-6400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 4 TB+2033% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 88+340% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: true (Core i7-13700K) vs VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT (Xeon 6780E). The Core i7-13700K includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Xeon 6780E requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon 6780E targets Cloud Native Compute. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700K rivals Ryzen 9 7900X; Xeon 6780E rivals EPYC 9754.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Xeon 6780E |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT |
| Target Use | — | Cloud Native Compute |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-13700K launched at $409 MSRP, while the Xeon 6780E debuted at $11350. On MSRP ($409 vs $11350), the Core i7-13700K is $10941 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-13700K delivers 111.9 pts/$ vs 7.6 pts/$ for the Xeon 6780E — making the Core i7-13700K the 174.4% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Xeon 6780E |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $409-96% | $11350 |
| Performance per Dollar | 111.9+1372% | 7.6 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













