PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i7-13700K

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +79.3% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 20 MB).
✅Delivers 175.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 40.6 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅Draws 125W instead of 130W, a 5W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and older memory support.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2667 v2, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.
❌
36.3% HIGHER MSRP
$409 MSRPvs$300 MSRP

Xeon E5-2667 v2

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅Costs $109 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
✅100% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (12,186 vs 45,784).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 30 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 40.6 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($300 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on LGA2011, while Core i7-13700K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Core i7-13700K

2022

Xeon E5-2667 v2

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +79.3% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 20 MB).
✅Delivers 175.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 40.6 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅Draws 125W instead of 130W, a 5W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and older memory support.

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅Costs $109 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
✅100% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2667 v2, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.
❌
36.3% HIGHER MSRP
$409 MSRPvs$300 MSRP

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (12,186 vs 45,784).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 30 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 40.6 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($300 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on LGA2011, while Core i7-13700K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-13700K better than Xeon E5-2667 v2?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon E5-2667 v2 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-13700K is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-13700K is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 79.3% more average FPS across 2 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-13700K is the better fit. You are getting 275.7% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 24 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 20 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-13700K is the smarter buy today. Core i7-13700K is 36.3% more expensive on MSRP at $409 MSRP versus $300 MSRP, and it gives you a 79.3% average FPS lead across 2 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 175.6% better value on MSRP (111.9 vs 40.6 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-13700K is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2013), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA2011, 50% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 20 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 24 threads instead of 8/16. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i7-13700K Benchmark Check

Xeon E5-2667 v2 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Xeon E5-2667 v2
1080p
low	284 FPS	170 FPS
medium	268 FPS	145 FPS
high	223 FPS	118 FPS
ultra	190 FPS	95 FPS
1440p
low	238 FPS	145 FPS
medium	200 FPS	120 FPS
high	159 FPS	95 FPS
ultra	139 FPS	77 FPS
4K
low	159 FPS	66 FPS
medium	134 FPS	59 FPS
high	103 FPS	46 FPS
ultra	90 FPS	36 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Xeon E5-2667 v2

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Xeon E5-2667 v2
1080p
low	689 FPS	305 FPS
medium	580 FPS	305 FPS
high	484 FPS	276 FPS
ultra	439 FPS	232 FPS
1440p
low	595 FPS	305 FPS
medium	525 FPS	288 FPS
high	441 FPS	245 FPS
ultra	378 FPS	203 FPS
4K
low	348 FPS	204 FPS
medium	314 FPS	187 FPS
high	295 FPS	169 FPS
ultra	261 FPS	139 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Xeon E5-2667 v2

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Xeon E5-2667 v2
1080p
low	648 FPS	305 FPS
medium	530 FPS	305 FPS
high	467 FPS	305 FPS
ultra	405 FPS	305 FPS
1440p
low	591 FPS	305 FPS
medium	491 FPS	305 FPS
high	427 FPS	305 FPS
ultra	371 FPS	305 FPS
4K
low	434 FPS	305 FPS
medium	374 FPS	305 FPS
high	339 FPS	305 FPS
ultra	290 FPS	305 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Xeon E5-2667 v2

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Xeon E5-2667 v2
1080p
low	970 FPS	305 FPS
medium	883 FPS	305 FPS
high	766 FPS	305 FPS
ultra	689 FPS	305 FPS
1440p
low	829 FPS	305 FPS
medium	740 FPS	305 FPS
high	642 FPS	305 FPS
ultra	566 FPS	305 FPS
4K
low	567 FPS	305 FPS
medium	515 FPS	305 FPS
high	463 FPS	305 FPS
ultra	404 FPS	305 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Xeon E5-2667 v2

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13700K and Xeon E5-2667 v2

Core i7-13700K

The Core i7-13700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,784 points. Launch price was $409.

Xeon E5-2667 v2

The Xeon E5-2667 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 12,186 points. Launch price was $2,300.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-13700K packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon E5-2667 v2 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i7-13700K has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700K versus 4 GHz on the Xeon E5-2667 v2 — a 29.8% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700K (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i7-13700K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon E5-2667 v2 uses Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700K scores 45,784 against the Xeon E5-2667 v2's 12,186 — a 115.9% lead for the Core i7-13700K. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700K vs 20 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2667 v2.

Feature	Core i7-13700K	Xeon E5-2667 v2
Cores / Threads	16 / 24+100%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	5.4 GHz+35%	4 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+3%	3.3 GHz
L3 Cache	30 MB (total)+50%	20 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+700%	256 kB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm-68%	22 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)	Ivy Bridge-EP (2013)
PassMark	45,784+276%	12,186
Cinebench R23 Multi	31,000	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,846	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	18,980	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-13700K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E5-2667 v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i7-13700K versus DDR3-1866 on the Xeon E5-2667 v2 — the Core i7-13700K supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5-2667 v2 supports up to 768 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-13700K) vs 4 (Xeon E5-2667 v2). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-13700K) vs 40 (Xeon E5-2667 v2) — the Xeon E5-2667 v2 offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel Z790,Intel H770,Intel B760,Intel Z690,Intel H670,Intel B660,Intel H610 (Core i7-13700K) and Intel X79,Intel C602 (Xeon E5-2667 v2).

Feature	Core i7-13700K	Xeon E5-2667 v2
Socket	LGA1700	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600+67%	DDR3-1866
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	768 GB+300%
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	40+100%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Core i7-13700K) / not specified (Xeon E5-2667 v2). The Core i7-13700K includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Xeon E5-2667 v2 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700K rivals Ryzen 9 7900X.

Feature	Core i7-13700K	Xeon E5-2667 v2
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Intel UHD Graphics 770	—
Unlocked	Yes	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	true	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-13700K launched at $409 MSRP, while the Xeon E5-2667 v2 debuted at $300. On MSRP ($409 vs $300), the Xeon E5-2667 v2 is $109 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-13700K delivers 111.9 pts/$ vs 40.6 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2667 v2 — making the Core i7-13700K the 93.5% better value option.