
Core i7-13800H
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 PRO 5845
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-13800H
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 32 MB).
Ryzen 7 PRO 5845
2022Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13800H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (26,054 vs 26,349).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $300 MSRP, while Core i7-13800H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i7-13800H moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
Core i7-13800H
2023Ryzen 7 PRO 5845
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 32 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13800H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (26,054 vs 26,349).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $300 MSRP, while Core i7-13800H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i7-13800H moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-13800H better than Ryzen 7 PRO 5845?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-13800H | Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 251 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 210 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 180 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 223 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 191 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 153 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 44 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-13800H | Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 615 FPS | 511 FPS |
| medium | 521 FPS | 431 FPS |
| high | 443 FPS | 336 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 295 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 533 FPS | 431 FPS |
| medium | 468 FPS | 377 FPS |
| high | 398 FPS | 305 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 256 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 313 FPS | 267 FPS |
| medium | 280 FPS | 236 FPS |
| high | 267 FPS | 208 FPS |
| ultra | 234 FPS | 179 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-13800H | Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 648 FPS | 649 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 529 FPS |
| high | 467 FPS | 480 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 411 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 590 FPS | 543 FPS |
| medium | 491 FPS | 449 FPS |
| high | 427 FPS | 409 FPS |
| ultra | 370 FPS | 350 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 433 FPS | 396 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 320 FPS |
| high | 338 FPS | 289 FPS |
| ultra | 289 FPS | 227 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-13800H | Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 659 FPS | 651 FPS |
| medium | 659 FPS | 651 FPS |
| high | 659 FPS | 651 FPS |
| ultra | 659 FPS | 641 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 659 FPS | 651 FPS |
| medium | 659 FPS | 651 FPS |
| high | 626 FPS | 593 FPS |
| ultra | 551 FPS | 511 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 555 FPS | 526 FPS |
| medium | 504 FPS | 473 FPS |
| high | 451 FPS | 426 FPS |
| ultra | 393 FPS | 371 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13800H and Ryzen 7 PRO 5845

Core i7-13800H
Core i7-13800H
The Core i7-13800H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 26,349 points. Launch price was $457.


Ryzen 7 PRO 5845
Ryzen 7 PRO 5845
The Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 26,054 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i7-13800H packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i7-13800H has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core i7-13800H versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 — a 12.2% clock advantage for the Core i7-13800H (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core i7-13800H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 uses Vermeer (2020−2025) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13800H scores 26,349 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845's 26,054 — a 1.1% lead for the Core i7-13800H. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i7-13800H vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845.
| Feature | Core i7-13800H | Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20+75% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5.2 GHz+13% | 4.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.4 GHz+36% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total) | 32 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+300% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) | Vermeer (2020−2025) |
| PassMark | 26,349+1% | 26,054 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-13800H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-13800H | Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












