Core i7-13800H vs Xeon Gold 6150

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-13800H vs Xeon Gold 6150 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-13800H vs Xeon Gold 6150: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-13800H

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +17.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 45W instead of 165W, a 120W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (26,349 vs 26,447).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6150, which brings 18 cores / 36 threads.

Xeon Gold 6150

2017

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 18 cores / 36 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13800H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $3,358 MSRP, while Core i7-13800H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌266.7% higher power demand at 165W vs 45W.
❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Core i7-13800H moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-13800H better than Xeon Gold 6150?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon Gold 6150 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-13800H is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6150 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 18 cores and 36 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-13800H is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon Gold 6150 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core i7-13800H comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $3,358 MSRP, and it still gives you a 17.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon Gold 6150 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.4% better PassMark. Xeon Gold 6150 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (7.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-13800H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2017) and a healthier platform with FCBGA1744 and DDR5 instead of LGA3647. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i7-13800H vs Xeon Gold 6150 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-13800H

The Core i7-13800H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 26,349 points. Launch price was $457.

Xeon Gold 6150

The Xeon Gold 6150 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 24.75 MB. L2 cache: 18 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 26,447 points. Launch price was $3,358.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-13800H packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6150 offers 18 cores / 36 threads — the Xeon Gold 6150 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core i7-13800H versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6150 — a 33.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-13800H (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Core i7-13800H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6150 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13800H scores 26,349 against the Xeon Gold 6150's 26,447 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon Gold 6150. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i7-13800H vs 24.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 6150.

Feature	Core i7-13800H	Xeon Gold 6150
Cores / Threads	14 / 20	18 / 36+29%
Boost Clock	5.2 GHz+41%	3.7 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	2.7 GHz+8%
L3 Cache	24 MB (total)	24.75 MB+3%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	18 MB+800%
Process	Intel 7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	26,349	26,447

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-13800H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Gold 6150 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.