Core i7-13800H vs Xeon E5-2699A v4

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-13800H vs Xeon E5-2699A v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-13800H vs Xeon E5-2699A v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-13800H

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 45W instead of 145W, a 100W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (26,349 vs 26,759).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 55 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2699A v4, which brings 22 cores / 44 threads.

Xeon E5-2699A v4

2016

Why buy it

✅+1.6% higher PassMark.
✅+129.2% larger total L3 cache (55 MB vs 24 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 22 cores / 44 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13800H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌222.2% higher power demand at 145W vs 45W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Core i7-13800H moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-13800H better than Xeon E5-2699A v4?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2699A v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-13800H is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2699A v4 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.6% better PassMark, backed by 22 cores and 44 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 129.2% larger total L3 cache (55 MB vs 24 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-13800H still makes the most sense overall. Core i7-13800H comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 8.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-13800H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2016) and a healthier platform with FCBGA1744 and DDR5 instead of LGA2011. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i7-13800H vs Xeon E5-2699A v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-13800H

The Core i7-13800H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 26,349 points. Launch price was $457.

Xeon E5-2699A v4

The Xeon E5-2699A v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 October 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-EP (2016) architecture. It features 22 cores and 44 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 55 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 145 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 26,759 points. Launch price was $4,938.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-13800H packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Xeon E5-2699A v4 offers 22 cores / 44 threads — the Xeon E5-2699A v4 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core i7-13800H versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-2699A v4 — a 36.4% clock advantage for the Core i7-13800H (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i7-13800H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon E5-2699A v4 uses Broadwell-EP (2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13800H scores 26,349 against the Xeon E5-2699A v4's 26,759 — a 1.5% lead for the Xeon E5-2699A v4. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i7-13800H vs 55 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2699A v4.

Feature	Core i7-13800H	Xeon E5-2699A v4
Cores / Threads	14 / 20	22 / 44+57%
Boost Clock	5.2 GHz+44%	3.6 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz+4%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	24 MB (total)	55 MB (total)+129%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+700%	256 kB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024)	Broadwell-EP (2016)
PassMark	26,349	26,759+2%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-13800H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E5-2699A v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.