Core i7-13800H vs Xeon D-2796TE

Intel

Core i7-13800H

14 Cores20 Thrd45 WWMax: 5.2 GHz2023
Core family
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon D-2796TE

20 Cores40 Thrd118 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2022

Core i7-13800H vs Xeon D-2796TE Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-13800H vs Xeon D-2796TE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-13800H vs Xeon D-2796TE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-13800H

2023

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +26.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 45W instead of 118W, a 73W reduction.
  • Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA2579 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 30 MB).
  • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-2796TE, which brings 20 cores / 40 threads.

Xeon D-2796TE

2022

Why buy it

  • +25% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 24 MB).
  • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 20 cores / 40 threads.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13800H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (26,342 vs 26,349).
  • 162.2% higher power demand at 118W vs 45W.
  • Older platform position on FCBGA2579 with DDR4, while Core i7-13800H moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-13800H better than Xeon D-2796TE?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon D-2796TE makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-13800H is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i7-13800H is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 26.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-13800H is the stronger fit. You are getting 0% better PassMark, backed by 14 cores and 20 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i7-13800H still makes the most sense overall. Core i7-13800H comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 26.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-13800H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022), a healthier platform with FCBGA1744 and DDR5 instead of FCBGA2579, and more multi-core headroom with 14 cores / 20 threads instead of 20/40. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-13800H vs Xeon D-2796TE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i7-13800H

The Core i7-13800H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 26,349 points. Launch price was $457.

Intel

Xeon D-2796TE

The Xeon D-2796TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2579. Thermal design power (TDP): 118 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 26,342 points. Launch price was $2,101.

Processing Power

The Core i7-13800H packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Xeon D-2796TE offers 20 cores / 40 threads — the Xeon D-2796TE has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core i7-13800H versus 3.1 GHz on the Xeon D-2796TE — a 50.6% clock advantage for the Core i7-13800H (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i7-13800H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon D-2796TE uses Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13800H scores 26,349 against the Xeon D-2796TE's 26,342 — a 0% lead for the Core i7-13800H. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i7-13800H vs 30 MB (total) on the Xeon D-2796TE.

FeatureCore i7-13800HXeon D-2796TE
Cores / Threads
14 / 20
20 / 40+43%
Boost Clock
5.2 GHz+68%
3.1 GHz
Base Clock
2.5 GHz+25%
2 GHz
L3 Cache
24 MB (total)
30 MB (total)+25%
L2 Cache
2 MB (per core)+60%
1.25 MB (per core)
Process
Intel 7 nm-30%
10 nm
Architecture
Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024)
Ice Lake-D (2022−2023)
PassMark
26,349
26,342
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-13800H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon D-2796TE uses FCBGA2579 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-13800HXeon D-2796TE
Socket
FCBGA1744
FCBGA2579
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0