Core i7-2600S
VS
Core i7-2860QM

Core i7-2600S vs Core i7-2860QM

Intel

Core i7-2600S

4 Cores8 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2011
VS
Intel

Core i7-2860QM

4 Cores8 Thrd45 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-2600S is positioned at rank 889 and the Core i7-2860QM is on rank 68, so the Core i7-2860QM offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-2600S

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
19969%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
18869%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
13700%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
4127%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
3269%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2860%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1638%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1617%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1472%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1472%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1455%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1416%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1396%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1391%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1378%
#299
Core i9-7980XE
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $300
95%
#889
Core i7-2600S
MSRP: $297|Avg: $99
100%
#890
Athlon II X2 250e
MSRP: $77|Avg: $15
100%
#891
Athlon II X2 250u
MSRP: $60|Avg: $15
100%
#892
Pentium G6951
MSRP: $89|Avg: $50
100%
#893
Core i3-2125
MSRP: $134|Avg: $15
100%
#895
Celeron G1820
MSRP: $110|Avg: $15
99%
#896
Celeron E1600
MSRP: $53|Avg: $10
99%
#897
Athlon II X2 270u
MSRP: $68|Avg: $10
98%
#898
Core i5-4570TE
MSRP: $202|Avg: $40
98%
#899
Core i3-2130
MSRP: $138|Avg: $138
96%
#902
Core i3-6100E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $50
94%
#903
Core i3-4330TE
MSRP: $138|Avg: $15
94%
#904
Pentium E5700
MSRP: $75|Avg: $15
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-2860QM

#15
Ryzen 5 220
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
95%
#18
Ryzen 5 8500G
MSRP: $179|Avg: $150
91%
#56
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
223%
#57
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
220%
#58
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
202%
#59
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
201%
#60
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
199%
#62
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
192%
#63
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
185%
#64
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
184%
#65
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
179%
#68
Core i7-2860QM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#69
Core 2 Quad Q9100
MSRP: $14|Avg: $14
98%
#75
Core i3-4030U
MSRP: $281|Avg: N/A
95%
#79
Atom D2500
MSRP: $42|Avg: N/A
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core i7-2600S delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core i7-2860QM in both compute-intensive tasks (0.9% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore i7-2600SCore i7-2860QM
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($99)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i7-2600SCore i7-2860QM
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($99)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-2600S and Core i7-2860QM

Intel

Core i7-2600S

The Core i7-2600S is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,637 points. Launch price was $210.

Intel

Core i7-2860QM

The Core i7-2860QM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 September 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 4,597 points. Launch price was $568.

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-2600S and Core i7-2860QM share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i7-2600S versus 3.6 GHz on the Core i7-2860QM — a 5.4% clock advantage for the Core i7-2600S (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). Both are built on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture using a 32 nm process. In PassMark, the Core i7-2600S scores 4,637 against the Core i7-2860QM's 4,597 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i7-2600S. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total) on the Core i7-2600S vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-2860QM.

FeatureCore i7-2600SCore i7-2860QM
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 8
Boost Clock
3.8 GHz+6%
3.6 GHz
Base Clock
2.8 GHz+12%
2.5 GHz
L3 Cache
8192 kB (total)
8 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
32 nm
32 nm
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
4,637
4,597
Geekbench 6 Single
630
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-2600S uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i7-2860QM uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Core i7-2600S versus 1600 on the Core i7-2860QM — the Core i7-2860QM supports 199.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H61,H67,Z68,B75 (Core i7-2600S) and HM65,HM67,QM67,QS67 (Core i7-2860QM).

FeatureCore i7-2600SCore i7-2860QM
Socket
LGA1155
PGA988
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
1600+53233%
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB+104857500%
32
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-2600S) vs true (Core i7-2860QM). Both include integrated graphics HD Graphics 2000 (Core i7-2600S) and Intel HD Graphics 3000 (Core i7-2860QM) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-2600S targets Low Power Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i7-2600S rivals Phenom II X4 910e; Core i7-2860QM rivals AMD A8-3510MX.

FeatureCore i7-2600SCore i7-2860QM
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 2000
Intel HD Graphics 3000
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
true
Target Use
Low Power Desktop