PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-7400T vs Core i7-2600S FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-7400T vs Core i7-2600S: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-7400T

2017

Why buy it

✅+1.2% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $115 less on MSRP ($182 MSRP vs $297 MSRP).
✅Delivers 65.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 25.8 vs 15.6 PassMark/$ ($182 MSRP vs $297 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-2600S across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).

Core i7-2600S

2011

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (4,637 vs 4,692).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.6 vs 25.8 PassMark/$ ($297 MSRP vs $182 MSRP).
❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-7400T better than Core i7-2600S?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i7-2600S is ahead with a 7.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-7400T pulls ahead with 1.2% better PassMark. Core i7-2600S also has the bigger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-7400T is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-7400T is the better buy right now. Core i5-7400T comes in $115 cheaper on MSRP at $182 MSRP versus $297 MSRP, and it still gives you 1.2% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core i7-2600S is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 7.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 65.1% better value on MSRP (25.8 vs 15.6 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-7400T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2011) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-7400T vs Core i7-2600S Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-7400T

The Core i5-7400T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,692 points. Launch price was $187.

Core i7-2600S

The Core i7-2600S is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,637 points. Launch price was $210.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-7400T packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core i7-2600S's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Core i5-7400T versus 3.8 GHz on the Core i7-2600S — a 23.5% clock advantage for the Core i7-2600S (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core i5-7400T uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-2600S uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-7400T scores 4,692 against the Core i7-2600S's 4,637 — a 1.2% lead for the Core i5-7400T. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,069 vs 630, a 51.7% lead for the Core i5-7400T that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-7400T vs 8192 kB (total) on the Core i7-2600S.

Feature	Core i5-7400T	Core i7-2600S
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3 GHz	3.8 GHz+27%
Base Clock	2.4 GHz	2.8 GHz+17%
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	8192 kB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm-56%	32 nm
Architecture	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	4,692+1%	4,637
Cinebench R23 Multi	3,334	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,069+70%	630
Geekbench 6 Multi	2,463	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-7400T uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-2600S uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Core i5-7400T versus DDR3-1333 on the Core i7-2600S — the Core i5-7400T supports 80% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-7400T supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: B150,Q170,B250,Q250,H110,Q270,H170,Z170,H270,Z270 (Core i5-7400T) and H61,H67,Z68,B75 (Core i7-2600S).

Feature	Core i5-7400T	Core i7-2600S
Socket	LGA1151	LGA1155
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400+80%	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB+100%	32 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: Yes (Core i5-7400T) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-2600S). Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics 630 (Core i5-7400T) and HD Graphics 2000 (Core i7-2600S) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-2600S targets Low Power Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i7-2600S rivals Phenom II X4 910e.

Feature	Core i5-7400T	Core i7-2600S
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Intel HD Graphics 630	HD Graphics 2000
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	Yes	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	—	Low Power Desktop

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-7400T was priced at $182, while the Core i7-2600S came in at $297. On launch pricing ($182 vs $297), Core i5-7400T was $115 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-7400T delivers 25.8 pts/$ vs 15.6 pts/$ for the Core i7-2600S — making the Core i5-7400T the 49.1% better value option.

Feature	Core i5-7400T	Core i7-2600S
MSRP	$182-39%	$297
Performance per Dollar	25.8+65%	15.6
Release Date	2017	2011

Search Core i5-7400T on Amazon

Search Core i7-2600S on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.