
Core i5-7400T
Popular choices:

Core i7-2600S
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-7400T
2017Why buy it
- ✅+1.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $115 less on MSRP ($182 MSRP vs $297 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 65.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 25.8 vs 15.6 PassMark/$ ($182 MSRP vs $297 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-2600S across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
Core i7-2600S
2011Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (4,637 vs 4,692).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.6 vs 25.8 PassMark/$ ($297 MSRP vs $182 MSRP).
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
Core i5-7400T
2017Core i7-2600S
2011Why buy it
- ✅+1.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $115 less on MSRP ($182 MSRP vs $297 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 65.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 25.8 vs 15.6 PassMark/$ ($182 MSRP vs $297 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-2600S across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (4,637 vs 4,692).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.6 vs 25.8 PassMark/$ ($297 MSRP vs $182 MSRP).
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-7400T better than Core i7-2600S?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-7400T | Core i7-2600S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 106 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 85 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 66 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 65 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 55 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-7400T | Core i7-2600S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 117 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 116 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 117 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 67 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-7400T | Core i7-2600S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 117 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 117 FPS | 116 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 117 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 117 FPS | 116 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 117 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 117 FPS | 116 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-7400T | Core i7-2600S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 117 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 117 FPS | 116 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 117 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 117 FPS | 116 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 117 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 117 FPS | 116 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-7400T and Core i7-2600S

Core i5-7400T
Core i5-7400T
The Core i5-7400T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,692 points. Launch price was $187.

Core i7-2600S
Core i7-2600S
The Core i7-2600S is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,637 points. Launch price was $210.
Processing Power
The Core i5-7400T packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core i7-2600S's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Core i5-7400T versus 3.8 GHz on the Core i7-2600S — a 23.5% clock advantage for the Core i7-2600S (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core i5-7400T uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-2600S uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-7400T scores 4,692 against the Core i7-2600S's 4,637 — a 1.2% lead for the Core i5-7400T. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,069 vs 630, a 51.7% lead for the Core i5-7400T that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-7400T vs 8192 kB (total) on the Core i7-2600S.
| Feature | Core i5-7400T | Core i7-2600S |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3 GHz | 3.8 GHz+27% |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 2.8 GHz+17% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 8192 kB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-56% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| PassMark | 4,692+1% | 4,637 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 3,334 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,069+70% | 630 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 2,463 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-7400T uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-2600S uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Core i5-7400T versus DDR3-1333 on the Core i7-2600S — the Core i5-7400T supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-7400T supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: B150,Q170,B250,Q250,H110,Q270,H170,Z170,H270,Z270 (Core i5-7400T) and H61,H67,Z68,B75 (Core i7-2600S).
| Feature | Core i5-7400T | Core i7-2600S |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | LGA1155 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400+33% | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB+100% | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: Yes (Core i5-7400T) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-2600S). Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics 630 (Core i5-7400T) and HD Graphics 2000 (Core i7-2600S) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-2600S targets Low Power Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i7-2600S rivals Phenom II X4 910e.
| Feature | Core i5-7400T | Core i7-2600S |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics 630 | HD Graphics 2000 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | Yes | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | — | Low Power Desktop |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-7400T launched at $182 MSRP, while the Core i7-2600S debuted at $297. On MSRP ($182 vs $297), the Core i5-7400T is $115 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-7400T delivers 25.8 pts/$ vs 15.6 pts/$ for the Core i7-2600S — making the Core i5-7400T the 49.1% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-7400T | Core i7-2600S |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $182-39% | $297 |
| Performance per Dollar | 25.8+65% | 15.6 |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2011 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












