
Core i7-2600S

FX-6350
Core i7-2600S vs FX-6350 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-2600S vs FX-6350 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-2600S vs FX-6350: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-2600S
2011Why buy it
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 2000, while FX-6350 needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike FX-6350.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (4,637 vs 4,640).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.6 vs 35.2 PassMark/$ ($297 MSRP vs $132 MSRP).
FX-6350
2013Why buy it
- ✅Costs $165 less on MSRP ($132 MSRP vs $297 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 125.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 35.2 vs 15.6 PassMark/$ ($132 MSRP vs $297 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-2600S can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i7-2600S.
Quick Answers
So, is FX-6350 better than Core i7-2600S?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-2600S vs FX-6350 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-2600S
The Core i7-2600S is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,637 points. Launch price was $210.

FX-6350
The FX-6350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 April 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L2 cache: 6144 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,640 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Core i7-2600S packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the FX-6350 offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the FX-6350 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i7-2600S versus 4.2 GHz on the FX-6350 — a 10% clock advantage for the FX-6350 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.9 GHz). The Core i7-2600S uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the FX-6350 uses Vishera (2012−2015) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-2600S scores 4,637 against the FX-6350's 4,640 — a 0.1% lead for the FX-6350.
| Feature | Core i7-2600S | FX-6350 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 6 / 6+50% |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz | 4.2 GHz+11% |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz | 3.9 GHz+39% |
| L3 Cache | 8192 kB (total) | — |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 6144 kB+2300% |
| Process | 32 nm | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Vishera (2012−2015) |
| PassMark | 4,637 | 4,640 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 630 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-2600S uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the FX-6350 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-2600S | FX-6350 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1155 | AM3+ |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-2600S) / not specified (FX-6350). The Core i7-2600S includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 2000), while the FX-6350 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-2600S targets Low Power Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i7-2600S rivals Phenom II X4 910e.
| Feature | Core i7-2600S | FX-6350 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 2000 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Low Power Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-2600S was priced at $297, while the FX-6350 came in at $132. On launch pricing ($297 vs $132), FX-6350 was $165 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-2600S delivers 15.6 pts/$ vs 35.2 pts/$ for the FX-6350 — making the FX-6350 the 77% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-2600S | FX-6350 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $297 | $132-56% |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.6 | 35.2+126% |
| Release Date | 2011 | 2013 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















