Core i7-2640M
VS
A4-5150M

Core i7-2640M vs A4-5150M

Intel

Core i7-2640M

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2011
VS
AMD

A4-5150M

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-2640M is positioned at rank 1159 and the A4-5150M is on rank 547, so the A4-5150M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-2640M

#1147
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
4150%
#1148
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
4089%
#1149
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3754%
#1150
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3737%
#1151
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3703%
#1153
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3576%
#1154
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
3429%
#1155
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
3423%
#1156
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
3331%
#1159
Core i7-2640M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
100%
#1161
Core M-5Y71
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
99%
#1162
Core i7-2620M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
99%
#1164
Celeron N3010
MSRP: $107|Avg: N/A
97%
#1165
Core i7-3537U
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
96%
#1166
Core M-5Y10a
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
96%
#1167
Core M-5Y31
MSRP: $281|Avg: $30
96%
#1168
Core M-5Y10c
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
96%
#1170
Celeron 1047UE
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
95%
#1171
Core M-5Y70
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
95%
#1172
Celeron U3400
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
95%
#1173
Celeron T1600
MSRP: $107|Avg: $15
94%
#1174
Pro A12-8800B
MSRP: $400|Avg: $40
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A4-5150M

#173
Core Ultra 5 238V
MSRP: $454|Avg: $454
98%
#535
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
720%
#536
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
709%
#537
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
651%
#538
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
648%
#539
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
642%
#541
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
620%
#542
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
595%
#543
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
594%
#544
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
578%
#547
A4-5150M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#549
Celeron Dual-Core T1500
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $49
100%
#557
Pentium P6200
MSRP: $60|Avg: $25
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core i7-2640M leads in gaming performance. However, the A4-5150M is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore i7-2640MA4-5150M
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($346)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Richland (2013−2014) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i7-2640MA4-5150M
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($346)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-2640M and A4-5150M

Intel

Core i7-2640M

The Core i7-2640M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 September 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,445 points. Launch price was $346.

AMD

A4-5150M

The A4-5150M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,446 points. Launch price was $50.

Processing Power

The Core i7-2640M packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the A4-5150M's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Core i7-2640M versus 3.3 GHz on the A4-5150M — a 5.9% clock advantage for the Core i7-2640M (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Core i7-2640M uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the A4-5150M uses Richland (2013−2014) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-2640M scores 2,445 against the A4-5150M's 2,446 — a 0% lead for the A4-5150M. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 563 vs 300, a 61% lead for the Core i7-2640M that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Core i7-2640M vs 0 kB on the A4-5150M.

FeatureCore i7-2640MA4-5150M
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 2
Boost Clock
3.5 GHz+6%
3.3 GHz
Base Clock
2.8 GHz+4%
2.7 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB
0 kB
L2 Cache
512 kB
512K (per core)
Process
32 nm
32 nm
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Richland (2013−2014)
PassMark
2,445
2,446
Geekbench 6 Single
563+88%
300
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,184
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-2640M uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the A4-5150M uses FS1r2 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1333 on the Core i7-2640M versus DDR3-1600 on the A4-5150M — the Core i7-2640M supports 199.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.

FeatureCore i7-2640MA4-5150M
Socket
PGA988
FS1r2
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
1333+44333%
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
16
16 GB+104857500%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Core i7-2640M) vs AMD-V (A4-5150M). Both include integrated graphics Intel HD Graphics 3000 (Core i7-2640M) and Radeon HD 8350G (A4-5150M) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-5150M targets Budget Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i7-2640M rivals Phenom II Black Edition N660; A4-5150M rivals Pentium 2020M.

FeatureCore i7-2640MA4-5150M
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 3000
Radeon HD 8350G
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
true
AMD-V
Target Use
Budget Laptop