Core i7-2675QM
VS
Core i5-7260U

Core i7-2675QM vs Core i5-7260U

Intel

Core i7-2675QM

4 Cores8 Thrd45 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2011
VS
Intel

Core i5-7260U

2 Cores4 Thrd15 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2017

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-2675QM is positioned at rank 1070 and the Core i5-7260U is on rank 297, so the Core i5-7260U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-2675QM

#1058
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2835%
#1059
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2793%
#1060
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2564%
#1061
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2553%
#1062
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2529%
#1064
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2443%
#1065
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2342%
#1066
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2338%
#1067
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2275%
#1070
Core i7-2675QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
100%
#1071
A9-9410
MSRP: $150|Avg: $25
100%
#1073
A8 Pro-7150B
MSRP: $150|Avg: $20
99%
#1074
A9-9420
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
99%
#1076
Celeron B730
MSRP: $70|Avg: $10
99%
#1078
A9-9425
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
98%
#1080
Core i5-4402E
MSRP: $266|Avg: $100
97%
#1082
A6-7000
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
97%
#1083
Core i5-2520M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
96%
#1084
Core i7-2710QE
MSRP: $378|Avg: $40
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-7260U

#86
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
100%
#285
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
445%
#286
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
439%
#287
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
403%
#288
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
401%
#289
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
397%
#291
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
384%
#292
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
368%
#293
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
367%
#294
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
357%
#297
Core i5-7260U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i5-7260U (2017) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore i7-2675QMCore i5-7260U
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($378)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
✨ Modern (Kaby Lake (2016−2019) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i7-2675QM (2011) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore i7-2675QMCore i5-7260U
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($378)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-2675QM and Core i5-7260U

Intel

Core i7-2675QM

The Core i7-2675QM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 October 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1224. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 3,913 points. Launch price was $378.

Intel

Core i5-7260U

The Core i5-7260U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,953 points. Launch price was $304.

Processing Power

The Core i7-2675QM packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i5-7260U offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Core i7-2675QM has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Core i7-2675QM versus 3.4 GHz on the Core i5-7260U — a 9.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-7260U (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core i7-2675QM uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i5-7260U uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-2675QM scores 3,913 against the Core i5-7260U's 3,953 — a 1% lead for the Core i5-7260U. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i7-2675QM vs 4 MB on the Core i5-7260U.

FeatureCore i7-2675QMCore i5-7260U
Cores / Threads
4 / 8+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3.1 GHz
3.4 GHz+10%
Base Clock
2.2 GHz
2.2 GHz
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)+50%
4 MB
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
512 kB+100%
Process
32 nm
14 nm-56%
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark
3,913
3,953+1%
Geekbench 6 Single
1,192
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-2675QM uses the FCBGA1224 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-7260U uses BGA1356 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Core i7-2675QM versus DDR4-2133 on the Core i5-7260U — the Core i5-7260U supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-7260U supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-2675QM) vs 12 (Core i5-7260U) — the Core i7-2675QM offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureCore i7-2675QMCore i5-7260U
Socket
FCBGA1224
BGA1356
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
DDR4-2133+33%
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
32 GB+100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16+33%
12
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Core i7-2675QM) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-7260U). Both include integrated graphics HD Graphics 3000 (Core i7-2675QM) and Iris Plus Graphics 640 (Core i5-7260U) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-2675QM targets Mobile, Core i5-7260U targets Mainstream Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-7260U rivals A12-9720P.

FeatureCore i7-2675QMCore i5-7260U
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 3000
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Mobile
Mainstream Laptop