Core i7-2675QM
VS
Core i5-2400

Core i7-2675QM vs Core i5-2400

Intel

Core i7-2675QM

4 Cores8 Thrd45 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2011
VS
Intel

Core i5-2400

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-2675QM is positioned at rank 1070 and the Core i5-2400 is on rank 772, so the Core i5-2400 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-2675QM

#1058
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2835%
#1059
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2793%
#1060
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2564%
#1061
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2553%
#1062
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2529%
#1064
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2443%
#1065
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2342%
#1066
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2338%
#1067
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2275%
#1070
Core i7-2675QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
100%
#1071
A9-9410
MSRP: $150|Avg: $25
100%
#1073
A8 Pro-7150B
MSRP: $150|Avg: $20
99%
#1074
A9-9420
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
99%
#1076
Celeron B730
MSRP: $70|Avg: $10
99%
#1078
A9-9425
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
98%
#1080
Core i5-4402E
MSRP: $266|Avg: $100
97%
#1082
A6-7000
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
97%
#1083
Core i5-2520M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
96%
#1084
Core i7-2710QE
MSRP: $378|Avg: $40
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-2400

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
14822%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
14006%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
10169%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3064%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2427%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2123%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1216%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1200%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1093%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1093%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1080%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1051%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1036%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1032%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1023%
#291
Core i9-7900X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $188
100%
#772
Core i5-2400
MSRP: $184|Avg: $25
100%
#773
Core i7-5775C
MSRP: $366|Avg: $150
100%
#775
Pentium G2140
MSRP: $100|Avg: $95
99%
#776
Core i7-4790T
MSRP: $303|Avg: $102
99%
#777
Core i5-2320
MSRP: $177|Avg: $22
99%
#778
Celeron E3500
MSRP: $62|Avg: $10
99%
#779
Pentium G2030
MSRP: $85|Avg: $85
99%
#780
Athlon II X2 260
MSRP: $60|Avg: $12
99%
#781
Athlon II X3 445
MSRP: $87|Avg: $15
99%
#783
Core i5-2310
MSRP: $177|Avg: $12
98%
#784
Core i5-5675C
MSRP: $276|Avg: $66
98%
#785
Core i5-2380P
MSRP: $177|Avg: $25
98%
#786
Core i5-4690
MSRP: $272|Avg: $120
98%
#787
FX-6120
MSRP: $188|Avg: $54
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core i5-2400 leads in gaming performance. However, the Core i7-2675QM is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 1.1% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore i7-2675QMCore i5-2400
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($378)
More affordable ($25)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Core i5-2400 stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 93% cheaper ($25 vs $378) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightCore i7-2675QMCore i5-2400
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+1395%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($378)
More affordable ($25)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-2675QM and Core i5-2400

Intel

Core i7-2675QM

The Core i7-2675QM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 October 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1224. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 3,913 points. Launch price was $378.

Intel

Core i5-2400

The Core i5-2400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,870 points. Launch price was $60.

Processing Power

The Core i7-2675QM packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the Core i5-2400's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Core i7-2675QM versus 3.4 GHz on the Core i5-2400 — a 9.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-2400 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). Both are built on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture using a 32 nm process. In PassMark, the Core i7-2675QM scores 3,913 against the Core i5-2400's 3,870 — a 1.1% lead for the Core i7-2675QM. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i7-2675QM vs 6144 kB (total) on the Core i5-2400.

FeatureCore i7-2675QMCore i5-2400
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 4
Boost Clock
3.1 GHz
3.4 GHz+10%
Base Clock
2.2 GHz
3.1 GHz+41%
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)
6144 kB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
32 nm
32 nm
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
3,913+1%
3,870
Geekbench 6 Single
595
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-2675QM uses the FCBGA1224 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-2400 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1333 memory speed. The Core i5-2400 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.

FeatureCore i7-2675QMCore i5-2400
Socket
FCBGA1224
LGA1155
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
32 GB+100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Core i7-2675QM) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-2400). Both include integrated graphics HD Graphics 3000 (Core i7-2675QM) and HD Graphics 2000 (Core i5-2400) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-2675QM targets Mobile, Core i5-2400 targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-2400 rivals Phenom II X4 975.

FeatureCore i7-2675QMCore i5-2400
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 3000
HD Graphics 2000
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Mobile
Legacy Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-2675QM launched at $378 MSRP, while the Core i5-2400 debuted at $184.

FeatureCore i7-2675QMCore i5-2400
MSRP
$378
$184-51%
Avg Price (30d)
$25
Release Date
2011
2011