Core i7-2710QE
VS
Pentium G4620

Core i7-2710QE vs Pentium G4620

Intel

Core i7-2710QE

4 Cores8 Thrd45 WWMax: 3 GHz2011
VS
Intel

Pentium G4620

2 Cores4 Thrd51 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2017

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-2710QE is positioned at rank 1084 and the Pentium G4620 is on rank 471, so the Pentium G4620 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-2710QE

#1072
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2958%
#1073
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2914%
#1074
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2675%
#1075
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2663%
#1076
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2639%
#1078
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2548%
#1079
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2444%
#1080
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2440%
#1081
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2374%
#1084
Core i7-2710QE
MSRP: $378|Avg: $40
100%
#1089
Core i5-3610ME
MSRP: $276|Avg: $22
97%
#1090
Core m3-7Y32
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
97%
#1092
Celeron B720
MSRP: $70|Avg: $10
96%
#1093
Celeron 847
MSRP: $134|Avg: $15
96%
#1094
Core i7-2630QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
95%
#1096
Core i7-2635QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
94%
#1097
Celeron 877
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
94%
#1098
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
MSRP: $134|Avg: $50
94%
#1099
Core i5-3337U
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium G4620

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
7128%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
6735%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
4890%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1473%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1167%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1021%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
585%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
577%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
525%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
525%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
520%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
506%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
498%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
496%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
492%
#364
Celeron G6900TE
MSRP: $53|Avg: $64
99%
#365
Core i5-8600T
MSRP: $213|Avg: $213
99%
#366
Celeron G4950
MSRP: $52|Avg: $63
99%
#367
Core i9-10900E
MSRP: $488|Avg: $450
98%
#368
Core i7-9700KF
MSRP: $374|Avg: $333
98%
#471
Pentium G4620
MSRP: $86|Avg: $154
100%
#476
Athlon X4 830
MSRP: $70|Avg: $25
99%
#480
Athlon X4 860K
MSRP: $80|Avg: $20
98%
#483
Core i7-8700
MSRP: $303|Avg: $110
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Pentium G4620 (2017) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4-2133/2400, DDR3L-1333/1600, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore i7-2710QEPentium G4620
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($40)
⚠️ Higher cost ($154)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
✨ Modern (Kaby Lake (2016−2019) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i7-2710QE (2011) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore i7-2710QEPentium G4620
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+284%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($40)
⚠️ Higher cost ($154)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-2710QE and Pentium G4620

Intel

Core i7-2710QE

The Core i7-2710QE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 3,749 points. Launch price was $378.

Intel

Pentium G4620

The Pentium G4620 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 51 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2133/2400, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 3,761 points. Launch price was $100.

Processing Power

The Core i7-2710QE packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Pentium G4620 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Core i7-2710QE has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Core i7-2710QE versus 3.7 GHz on the Pentium G4620 — a 20.9% clock advantage for the Pentium G4620 (base: 2.1 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Core i7-2710QE uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium G4620 uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-2710QE scores 3,749 against the Pentium G4620's 3,761 — a 0.3% lead for the Pentium G4620. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i7-2710QE vs 3 MB (total) on the Pentium G4620.

FeatureCore i7-2710QEPentium G4620
Cores / Threads
4 / 8+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3 GHz
3.7 GHz+23%
Base Clock
2.1 GHz
3.7 GHz+76%
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)+100%
3 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
32 nm
14 nm-56%
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark
3,749
3,761
Geekbench 6 Single
604
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-2710QE uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium G4620 uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-2710QEPentium G4620
Socket
PGA988
LGA1151
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-2710QE) / not specified (Pentium G4620). The Core i7-2710QE includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 3000), while the Pentium G4620 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-2710QE targets Embedded/Industrial. Direct competitor: Core i7-2710QE rivals Embedded R-Series.

FeatureCore i7-2710QEPentium G4620
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 3000
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Embedded/Industrial
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-2710QE launched at $378 MSRP, while the Pentium G4620 debuted at $86. At current prices ($40 vs $154), the Core i7-2710QE is $114 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-2710QE delivers 93.7 pts/$ vs 24.4 pts/$ for the Pentium G4620 — making the Core i7-2710QE the 117.3% better value option.

FeatureCore i7-2710QEPentium G4620
MSRP
$378
$86-77%
Avg Price (30d)
$40-74%
$154
Performance per Dollar
93.7+284%
24.4
Release Date
2011
2017