
Core i7-2710QE

PRO A12-9800
Core i7-2710QE vs PRO A12-9800 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-2710QE vs PRO A12-9800 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-2710QE vs PRO A12-9800: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-2710QE
2011Why buy it
- β Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 3000, while PRO A12-9800 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark (3,749 vs 3,751).
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 9.9 vs 34.1 PassMark/$ ($378 MSRP vs $110 MSRP).
PRO A12-9800
2016Why buy it
- β Costs $268 less on MSRP ($110 MSRP vs $378 MSRP).
- β Delivers 243.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 34.1 vs 9.9 PassMark/$ ($110 MSRP vs $378 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- β44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
- βNo integrated graphics, while Core i7-2710QE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is PRO A12-9800 better than Core i7-2710QE?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-2710QE vs PRO A12-9800 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-2710QE
The Core i7-2710QE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011β2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 3,749 points. Launch price was $378.

PRO A12-9800
The PRO A12-9800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 3 October 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016β2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,751 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Core i7-2710QE packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the PRO A12-9800's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Core i7-2710QE versus 4.2 GHz on the PRO A12-9800 β a 33.3% clock advantage for the PRO A12-9800 (base: 2.1 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core i7-2710QE uses the Sandy Bridge (2011β2013) architecture (32 nm), while the PRO A12-9800 uses Bristol Ridge (2016β2019) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-2710QE scores 3,749 against the PRO A12-9800's 3,751 β a 0.1% lead for the PRO A12-9800.
| Feature | Core i7-2710QE | PRO A12-9800 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3 GHz | 4.2 GHz+40% |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz | 3.8 GHz+81% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | β |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 2048 kB+700% |
| Process | 32 nm | 28 nm-13% |
| Architecture | Sandy Bridge (2011β2013) | Bristol Ridge (2016β2019) |
| PassMark | 3,749 | 3,751 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 604 | β |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-2710QE uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the PRO A12-9800 uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-2710QE | PRO A12-9800 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA988 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | β |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | β |
| RAM Channels | 2 | β |
| ECC Support | No | β |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | β |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-2710QE) / not specified (PRO A12-9800). The Core i7-2710QE includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 3000), while the PRO A12-9800 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-2710QE targets Embedded/Industrial. Direct competitor: Core i7-2710QE rivals Embedded R-Series.
| Feature | Core i7-2710QE | PRO A12-9800 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | β |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 3000 | β |
| Unlocked | No | β |
| AVX-512 | No | β |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | β |
| Target Use | Embedded/Industrial | β |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-2710QE was priced at $378, while the PRO A12-9800 came in at $110. On launch pricing ($378 vs $110), PRO A12-9800 was $268 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-2710QE delivers 9.9 pts/$ vs 34.1 pts/$ for the PRO A12-9800 β making the PRO A12-9800 the 109.9% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-2710QE | PRO A12-9800 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $378 | $110-71% |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.9 | 34.1+244% |
| Release Date | 2011 | 2016 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















