Core i7-2760QM
VS
Opteron 3380

Core i7-2760QM vs Opteron 3380

Intel

Core i7-2760QM

4 Cores8 Thrd45 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2011
VS
AMD

Opteron 3380

8 Cores8 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-2760QM is positioned at rank 249 and the Opteron 3380 is on rank 79, so the Opteron 3380 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-2760QM

#237
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
408%
#238
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
402%
#239
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
369%
#240
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
368%
#241
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
364%
#243
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
352%
#244
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
337%
#245
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
337%
#246
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
328%
#249
Core i7-2760QM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Opteron 3380

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
1908%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
360%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
320%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
247%
#64
EPYC 4344P
MSRP: $329|Avg: $314
99%
#65
EPYC 4364P
MSRP: $399|Avg: $334
94%
#66
EPYC 4585PX
MSRP: $699|Avg: $826
93%
#67
EPYC 4545P
MSRP: $549|Avg: $595
91%
#79
Opteron 3380
MSRP: $229|Avg: $427
100%
#82
Xeon W-10855M
MSRP: $118|Avg: $43
95%
#85
Opteron 6234
MSRP: $377|Avg: $141
93%
#86
Xeon E7330
MSRP: $64|Avg: $60
93%
#88
Opteron 6212
MSRP: $266|Avg: N/A
91%
#90
Opteron 4334
MSRP: $204|Avg: $130
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Opteron 3380 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core i7-2760QM in both compute-intensive tasks (1% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore i7-2760QMOpteron 3380
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($427)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Delhi (2012−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i7-2760QMOpteron 3380
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($427)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-2760QM and Opteron 3380

Intel

Core i7-2760QM

The Core i7-2760QM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 September 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 4,313 points. Launch price was $378.

AMD

Opteron 3380

The Opteron 3380 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Delhi (2012−2013) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 8192 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,358 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The Core i7-2760QM packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Opteron 3380 offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the Opteron 3380 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Core i7-2760QM versus 3.6 GHz on the Opteron 3380 — a 2.8% clock advantage for the Opteron 3380 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core i7-2760QM uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Opteron 3380 uses Delhi (2012−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-2760QM scores 4,313 against the Opteron 3380's 4,358 — a 1% lead for the Opteron 3380. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i7-2760QM vs 8192 kB (total) on the Opteron 3380.

FeatureCore i7-2760QMOpteron 3380
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
8 / 8+100%
Boost Clock
3.5 GHz
3.6 GHz+3%
Base Clock
2.4 GHz
2.6 GHz+8%
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)
8192 kB (total)+33%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
8192 kB+3100%
Process
32 nm
32 nm
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Delhi (2012−2013)
PassMark
4,313
4,358+1%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-2760QM uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Opteron 3380 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-2760QMOpteron 3380
Socket
PGA988
AM3+
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
1600
Max RAM Capacity
32
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Core i7-2760QM) / not specified (Opteron 3380). The Core i7-2760QM includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 3000), while the Opteron 3380 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-2760QM rivals AMD A8-3510MX.

FeatureCore i7-2760QMOpteron 3380
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 3000
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true