Core i5-3475S vs Core i7-2760QM

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-3475S vs Core i7-2760QM FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-3475S vs Core i7-2760QM: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-3475S

2012

Why buy it

✅+0% higher PassMark.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-2760QM.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-2760QM across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $249 MSRP, while Core i7-2760QM mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.

Core i7-2760QM

2011

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (4,313 vs 4,315).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-3475S.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-3475S better than Core i7-2760QM?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i7-2760QM is ahead with a 7.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-3475S pulls ahead with 0% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-3475S is the stronger fit. You are getting 0% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-3475S is the better buy right now. Core i5-3475S comes in at an unclear MSRP at $249 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core i7-2760QM is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 7.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (17.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-3475S makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2011) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-3475S vs Core i7-2760QM Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-3475S

The Core i5-3475S is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,315 points. Launch price was $219.

Core i7-2760QM

The Core i7-2760QM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 September 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 4,313 points. Launch price was $378.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-3475S packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core i7-2760QM's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Core i5-3475S versus 3.5 GHz on the Core i7-2760QM — a 2.8% clock advantage for the Core i5-3475S (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i5-3475S uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i7-2760QM uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-3475S scores 4,315 against the Core i7-2760QM's 4,313 — a 0% lead for the Core i5-3475S. Both processors carry 6 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Core i5-3475S	Core i7-2760QM
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.6 GHz+3%	3.5 GHz
Base Clock	2.9 GHz+21%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	6 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	256K (per core)
Process	22 nm-31%	32 nm
Architecture	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	4,315	4,313
Geekbench 6 Single	705	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,544	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-3475S uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-2760QM uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1600 memory speed. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H61,B75,H77,Z75,Z77 (Core i5-3475S) and HM65,HM67,QM67,QS67 (Core i7-2760QM).

Feature	Core i5-3475S	Core i7-2760QM
Socket	LGA1155	PGA988
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	1600
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	32 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-3475S) vs true (Core i7-2760QM). Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics 4000 (Core i5-3475S) and Intel HD Graphics 3000 (Core i7-2760QM) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-3475S targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i5-3475S rivals FX-6300; Core i7-2760QM rivals AMD A8-3510MX.