Core i5-3475S vs Core i7-2920XM

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-3475S vs Core i7-2920XM FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-3475S vs Core i7-2920XM: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-3475S

2012

Why buy it

✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-2920XM.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-2920XM across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (4,315 vs 4,336).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $249 MSRP, while Core i7-2920XM mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌18.2% higher power demand at 65W vs 55W.

Core i7-2920XM

2011

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
✅Draws 55W instead of 65W, a 10W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-3475S.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-2920XM better than Core i5-3475S?

Yes. Core i7-2920XM is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 8.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.5% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-2920XM is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 8.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-2920XM is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-2920XM is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core i7-2920XM comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $249 MSRP, and it still gives you a 8.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-3475S only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2012 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (17.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1155.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-3475S makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2011). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i5-3475S vs Core i7-2920XM Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-3475S

The Core i5-3475S is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,315 points. Launch price was $219.

Core i7-2920XM

The Core i7-2920XM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,336 points. Launch price was $1,096.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-3475S packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core i7-2920XM's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Core i5-3475S versus 3.5 GHz on the Core i7-2920XM — a 2.8% clock advantage for the Core i5-3475S (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i5-3475S uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i7-2920XM uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-3475S scores 4,315 against the Core i7-2920XM's 4,336 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i7-2920XM. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-3475S vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-2920XM.

Feature	Core i5-3475S	Core i7-2920XM
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.6 GHz+3%	3.5 GHz
Base Clock	2.9 GHz+16%	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	8 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	256K (per core)
Process	22 nm-31%	32 nm
Architecture	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	4,315	4,336
Geekbench 6 Single	705	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,544	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-3475S uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-2920XM uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1600 memory speed. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H61,B75,H77,Z75,Z77 (Core i5-3475S) and HM65,HM67,QM67,QS67 (Core i7-2920XM).

Feature	Core i5-3475S	Core i7-2920XM
Socket	LGA1155	PGA988
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	1600
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	32 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i7-2920XM has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-3475S) vs true (Core i7-2920XM). Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics 4000 (Core i5-3475S) and Intel HD Graphics 3000 (Core i7-2920XM) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-3475S targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i5-3475S rivals FX-6300; Core i7-2920XM rivals Core i7-2820QM.