
Core i5-3475S

Opteron 4376 HE
Core i5-3475S vs Opteron 4376 HE Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-3475S vs Opteron 4376 HE FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-3475S vs Opteron 4376 HE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-3475S
2012Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4000, while Opteron 4376 HE needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Opteron 4376 HE.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Opteron 4376 HE across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (4,315 vs 4,318).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Opteron 4376 HE, which brings 8 cores / 8 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $249 MSRP, while Opteron 4376 HE mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Opteron 4376 HE
2012Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 8 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-3475S can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-3475S.
Quick Answers
So, is Opteron 4376 HE better than Core i5-3475S?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-3475S vs Opteron 4376 HE Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-3475S
The Core i5-3475S is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,315 points. Launch price was $219.

Opteron 4376 HE
The Opteron 4376 HE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Seoul (2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 8192 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: C32. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,318 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Core i5-3475S packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Opteron 4376 HE offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the Opteron 4376 HE has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Core i5-3475S versus 3.6 GHz on the Opteron 4376 HE — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core i5-3475S uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Opteron 4376 HE uses Seoul (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-3475S scores 4,315 against the Opteron 4376 HE's 4,318 — a 0.1% lead for the Opteron 4376 HE. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-3475S vs 8192 kB (total) on the Opteron 4376 HE.
| Feature | Core i5-3475S | Opteron 4376 HE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 8 / 8+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3.6 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz+12% | 2.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 8192 kB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 8192 kB+3100% |
| Process | 22 nm-31% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | Seoul (2012) |
| PassMark | 4,315 | 4,318 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 705 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,544 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-3475S uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Opteron 4376 HE uses C32 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-3475S | Opteron 4376 HE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1155 | C32 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-3475S) / not specified (Opteron 4376 HE). The Core i5-3475S includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4000), while the Opteron 4376 HE requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-3475S targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i5-3475S rivals FX-6300.
| Feature | Core i5-3475S | Opteron 4376 HE |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 4000 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















