
Core i7-2820QM vs Core i3-6320

Core i7-2820QM

Core i3-6320
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-2820QM is positioned at rank 1138 and the Core i3-6320 is on rank 630, so the Core i3-6320 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i7-2820QM
Performance Per Dollar Core i3-6320
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i7-2820QM | Core i3-6320 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($568) | ✅ More affordable ($35) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Skylake (2015−2016) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i7-2820QM | Core i3-6320 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+1538%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($568) | ✅ More affordable ($35) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-2820QM and Core i3-6320

Core i7-2820QM
The Core i7-2820QM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 4,379 points. Launch price was $568.

Core i3-6320
The Core i3-6320 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 51 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,421 points. Launch price was $157.
Processing Power
The Core i7-2820QM packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i3-6320 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Core i7-2820QM has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Core i7-2820QM versus 3.9 GHz on the Core i3-6320 — a 13.7% clock advantage for the Core i3-6320 (base: 2.3 GHz vs 3.9 GHz). The Core i7-2820QM uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i3-6320 uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-2820QM scores 4,379 against the Core i3-6320's 4,421 — a 1% lead for the Core i3-6320. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 554 vs 1,311, a 81.2% lead for the Core i3-6320 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,763 vs 2,730 (43% advantage for the Core i3-6320). L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-2820QM vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-6320.
| Feature | Core i7-2820QM | Core i3-6320 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8+100% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.4 GHz | 3.9 GHz+15% |
| Base Clock | 2.3 GHz | 3.9 GHz+70% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total)+100% | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 32 nm | 14 nm-56% |
| Architecture | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Skylake (2015−2016) |
| PassMark | 4,379 | 4,421 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 2,853 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 554 | 1,311+137% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,763 | 2,730+55% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-2820QM uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i3-6320 uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1600 on the Core i7-2820QM versus DDR4-2133 on the Core i3-6320 — the Core i7-2820QM supports 199% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-6320 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: HM65,HM67,QM67,QS67 (Core i7-2820QM) and H110,H170,Z170,Q170,Q150,B150,B250,H270,Z270,Q270,Q250 (Core i3-6320).
| Feature | Core i7-2820QM | Core i3-6320 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA988 | LGA1151 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | 1600+39900% | DDR4-2133 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 | 64 GB+209715100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: true (Core i7-2820QM) vs Yes (Core i3-6320). Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics 3000 (Core i7-2820QM) and Intel HD Graphics 530 (Core i3-6320) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-2820QM rivals AMD A8-3510MX.
| Feature | Core i7-2820QM | Core i3-6320 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics 3000 | Intel HD Graphics 530 |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | Yes |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-2820QM launched at $568 MSRP, while the Core i3-6320 debuted at $160.
| Feature | Core i7-2820QM | Core i3-6320 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $568 | $160-72% |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $35 |
| Release Date | 2011 | 2015 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















