
Core i7-2820QM

Opteron 3380
Core i7-2820QM vs Opteron 3380 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-2820QM vs Opteron 3380 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-2820QM vs Opteron 3380: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-2820QM
2011Why buy it
- β +0.5% higher PassMark.
- β Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 3000, while Opteron 3380 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βLess compelling for workstation-style loads than Opteron 3380, which brings 8 cores / 8 threads.
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 7.7 vs 19.0 PassMark/$ ($568 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
Opteron 3380
2012Why buy it
- β Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 8 threads.
- β Costs $339 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $568 MSRP).
- β Delivers 146.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 19.0 vs 7.7 PassMark/$ ($229 MSRP vs $568 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark (4,358 vs 4,379).
- β44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
- βNo integrated graphics, while Core i7-2820QM can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Opteron 3380 better than Core i7-2820QM?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-2820QM vs Opteron 3380 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-2820QM
The Core i7-2820QM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011β2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 4,379 points. Launch price was $568.

Opteron 3380
The Opteron 3380 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Delhi (2012β2013) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 8192 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,358 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Core i7-2820QM packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Opteron 3380 offers 8 cores / 8 threads β the Opteron 3380 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Core i7-2820QM versus 3.6 GHz on the Opteron 3380 β a 5.7% clock advantage for the Opteron 3380 (base: 2.3 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core i7-2820QM uses the Sandy Bridge (2011β2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Opteron 3380 uses Delhi (2012β2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-2820QM scores 4,379 against the Opteron 3380's 4,358 β a 0.5% lead for the Core i7-2820QM. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-2820QM vs 8192 kB (total) on the Opteron 3380.
| Feature | Core i7-2820QM | Opteron 3380 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 8 / 8+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3.4 GHz | 3.6 GHz+6% |
| Base Clock | 2.3 GHz | 2.6 GHz+13% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 8192 kB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 8192 kB+3100% |
| Process | 32 nm | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Sandy Bridge (2011β2013) | Delhi (2012β2013) |
| PassMark | 4,379 | 4,358 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 554 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,763 | β |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-2820QM uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Opteron 3380 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-2820QM | Opteron 3380 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA988 | AM3+ |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 1600 | β |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 | β |
| RAM Channels | 2 | β |
| ECC Support | No | β |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | β |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: true (Core i7-2820QM) / not specified (Opteron 3380). The Core i7-2820QM includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 3000), while the Opteron 3380 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-2820QM rivals AMD A8-3510MX.
| Feature | Core i7-2820QM | Opteron 3380 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | β |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics 3000 | β |
| Unlocked | No | β |
| AVX-512 | No | β |
| Virtualization | true | β |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-2820QM was priced at $568, while the Opteron 3380 came in at $229. On launch pricing ($568 vs $229), Opteron 3380 was $339 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-2820QM delivers 7.7 pts/$ vs 19.0 pts/$ for the Opteron 3380 β making the Opteron 3380 the 84.7% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-2820QM | Opteron 3380 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $568 | $229-60% |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.7 | 19.0+147% |
| Release Date | 2011 | 2012 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















