Core i7-2820QM
VS
Xeon L5639

Core i7-2820QM vs Xeon L5639

Intel

Core i7-2820QM

4 Cores8 Thrd45 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2011
VS
Intel

Xeon L5639

6 Cores12 Thrd60 WWMax: 2.67 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-2820QM is positioned at rank 1138 and the Xeon L5639 is on rank 595, so the Xeon L5639 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-2820QM

#1126
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3805%
#1127
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3750%
#1128
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3442%
#1129
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3427%
#1130
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3395%
#1132
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3279%
#1133
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
3144%
#1134
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
3139%
#1135
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
3054%
#1138
Core i7-2820QM
MSRP: $568|Avg: N/A
100%
#1139
Core i5-520M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
100%
#1141
Celeron 807
MSRP: $70|Avg: $10
99%
#1142
Pentium B950
MSRP: $134|Avg: $35
99%
#1143
Celeron 220
MSRP: $42|Avg: $42
99%
#1144
Pentium B960
MSRP: $134|Avg: $15
99%
#1146
Pentium 957
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
98%
#1147
Core 2 Duo SL9400
MSRP: $284|Avg: N/A
98%
#1149
Pentium N3540
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
97%
#1150
Core i7-3555LE
MSRP: $300|Avg: $280
97%
#1151
Core i3-2377M
MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A
96%
#1152
Core 2 Duo E8435
MSRP: $150|Avg: $74
95%
#1153
Celeron M 723
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon L5639

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
9404%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
1776%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
1577%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1219%
#355
Xeon w7-3455
MSRP: $2489|Avg: $2625
100%
#356
EPYC 9334
MSRP: $2990|Avg: $1810
99%
#357
Xeon w9-3575X
MSRP: $3789|Avg: $675
99%
#358
Xeon w7-3465X
MSRP: $2889|Avg: $468
98%
#359
Xeon Gold 6530
MSRP: $2128|Avg: $1846
98%
#359
EPYC 9354
MSRP: $3420|Avg: $2498
98%
#361
Xeon Silver 4114
MSRP: $612|Avg: $30
97%
#362
EPYC 7532
MSRP: $2380|Avg: $225
96%
#363
Xeon W-2191B
MSRP: $1333|Avg: $39
96%
#364
Xeon Gold 5320
MSRP: $1780|Avg: $1834
95%
#595
Xeon L5639
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#605
Xeon E3-1270 v3
MSRP: $339|Avg: $410
97%
#607
Xeon E3-1235
MSRP: $240|Avg: $270
96%
#610
Xeon E3-1265L v3
MSRP: $294|Avg: $398
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon L5639 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightCore i7-2820QMXeon L5639
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($568)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Westmere-EP (2010−2011) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i7-2820QM ($568), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($568 less, Infinity% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightCore i7-2820QMXeon L5639
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($568)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-2820QM and Xeon L5639

Intel

Core i7-2820QM

The Core i7-2820QM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 4,379 points. Launch price was $568.

Intel

Xeon L5639

The Xeon L5639 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.133 GHz, with boost up to 2.67 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 60 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,419 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The Core i7-2820QM packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon L5639 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon L5639 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Core i7-2820QM versus 2.67 GHz on the Xeon L5639 — a 24.1% clock advantage for the Core i7-2820QM (base: 2.3 GHz vs 2.133 GHz). The Core i7-2820QM uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon L5639 uses Westmere-EP (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-2820QM scores 4,379 against the Xeon L5639's 4,419 — a 0.9% lead for the Xeon L5639. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-2820QM vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon L5639.

FeatureCore i7-2820QMXeon L5639
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
6 / 12+50%
Boost Clock
3.4 GHz+27%
2.67 GHz
Base Clock
2.3 GHz+8%
2.133 GHz
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
12 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
32 nm
32 nm
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
PassMark
4,379
4,419
Geekbench 6 Single
554
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,763
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-2820QM uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon L5639 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-2820QMXeon L5639
Socket
PGA988
LGA1366
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 4.0+100%
Max RAM Speed
1600
Max RAM Capacity
32
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Core i7-2820QM) / not specified (Xeon L5639). The Core i7-2820QM includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 3000), while the Xeon L5639 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-2820QM rivals AMD A8-3510MX.

FeatureCore i7-2820QMXeon L5639
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 3000
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true