Core i7-2920XM
VS
Core i5-3475S

Core i7-2920XM vs Core i5-3475S

Intel

Core i7-2920XM

4 Cores8 Thrd55 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2011
VS
Intel

Core i5-3475S

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-2920XM is positioned at rank 717 and the Core i5-3475S is on rank 859, so the Core i7-2920XM offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-2920XM

#705
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1015%
#706
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1000%
#707
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
918%
#708
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
914%
#709
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
905%
#711
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
874%
#712
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
838%
#713
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
837%
#714
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
815%
#717
Core i7-2920XM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#718
Core i3-1315UE
MSRP: $312|Avg: $250
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-3475S

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
17987%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
16996%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
12340%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3718%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2945%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2576%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1475%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1456%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1326%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1326%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1311%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1276%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1258%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1253%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1241%
#298
Core i9-7960X
MSRP: $1699|Avg: $185
95%
#859
Core i5-3475S
MSRP: $249|Avg: $42
100%
#860
Core i7-2600K
MSRP: $317|Avg: $109
100%
#861
Pentium G860
MSRP: $86|Avg: $36
100%
#862
Athlon II X2 245
MSRP: $66|Avg: $15
99%
#863
Core i7-2700K
MSRP: $332|Avg: $45
99%
#865
Core i5-4670K
MSRP: $328|Avg: $200
98%
#866
Core i5-3330S
MSRP: $231|Avg: $30
98%
#867
Celeron G465
MSRP: $70|Avg: $37
98%
#868
Athlon II X4 630
MSRP: $129|Avg: $15
97%
#869
A6-7400K
MSRP: $101|Avg: $43
96%
#870
Core i7-4765T
MSRP: $303|Avg: $50
96%
#871
Core i7-4770TE
MSRP: $303|Avg: $303
96%
#872
Core i5-4570T
MSRP: $195|Avg: $45
95%
#873
Athlon II X2 260u
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core i5-3475S leads in gaming performance. However, the Core i7-2920XM is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.5% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore i7-2920XMCore i5-3475S
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($42)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i7-2920XMCore i5-3475S
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($42)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-2920XM and Core i5-3475S

Intel

Core i7-2920XM

The Core i7-2920XM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,336 points. Launch price was $1,096.

Intel

Core i5-3475S

The Core i5-3475S is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,315 points. Launch price was $219.

Processing Power

The Core i7-2920XM packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the Core i5-3475S's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Core i7-2920XM versus 3.6 GHz on the Core i5-3475S — a 2.8% clock advantage for the Core i5-3475S (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core i7-2920XM uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i5-3475S uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-2920XM scores 4,336 against the Core i5-3475S's 4,315 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i7-2920XM. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-2920XM vs 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-3475S.

FeatureCore i7-2920XMCore i5-3475S
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 4
Boost Clock
3.5 GHz
3.6 GHz+3%
Base Clock
2.5 GHz
2.9 GHz+16%
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)+33%
6 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
32 nm
22 nm-31%
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark
4,336
4,315
Geekbench 6 Single
705
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,544
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-2920XM uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-3475S uses LGA1155 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1600 on the Core i7-2920XM versus DDR3-1600 on the Core i5-3475S — the Core i7-2920XM supports 199.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 32 of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: HM65,HM67,QM67,QS67 (Core i7-2920XM) and H61,B75,H77,Z75,Z77 (Core i5-3475S).

FeatureCore i7-2920XMCore i5-3475S
Socket
PGA988
LGA1155
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
1600+53233%
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
32
32 GB+104857500%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i7-2920XM has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: true (Core i7-2920XM) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-3475S). Both include integrated graphics Intel HD Graphics 3000 (Core i7-2920XM) and HD Graphics 4000 (Core i5-3475S) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-3475S targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i7-2920XM rivals Core i7-2820QM; Core i5-3475S rivals FX-6300.

FeatureCore i7-2920XMCore i5-3475S
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 3000
HD Graphics 4000
Unlocked
Yes
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
true
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Budget